首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in education annual conference;Frontiers in education conference >Corporate Structure in the Classroom: A Model for Teaching Engineering Design
【24h】

Corporate Structure in the Classroom: A Model for Teaching Engineering Design

机译:课堂中的公司结构:教学工程设计模型

获取原文

摘要

Design in the engineering curriculum has received considerable attention over the last several years. Our experiences at Northern Arizona University with a senior level capstone engineering design course have demonstrated the educational value of complex and challenging design tasks performed on a real project for a real customer. Observing the design teams in action and evaluating the results of their efforts, however, clearly shows that the students enter the senior design course with strong analytical skills and endless enthusiasm but without adequate experience in doing design, dealing with uncertainty, working as part of a team, and implementing a complex project. To correct this lack of preparation we decided to implement some changes in our engineering curriculum and piloted an interdisciplinary sophomore level design course in the Fall 1994 semester. [1]The experimental course was structured as a simulated engineering company dealing with the design of robotic devices for use in hazardous materials handling. An interdisciplinary team of six faculty played the roles of company president, four division managers, and a quality manager. Thirty-three students played the roles of design engineers, with each division of the company having approximately two students from each of the four engineering disciplines (electrical, mechanical, civil / environmental, and computer science). A member of the college's industrial advisory board played the role of our customer, and our campus safety officer played the role of an Environmental Protection Agency representative. The course dealt with technical, legal, ethical, financial, and personnel issues and addressed problems of incomplete information, limited resources and materials availability, team dynamics, and employee and public safety. Communication and documentation were emphasized through written and e-mail status reports, design reviews, formal presentations, and the use of computer tools for scheduling, design, and presentation. The course ended up with four different working models of computer controlled robotic devicesand 33 students that can hardly wait for the next design course.The sophomore design course was a great success and has led each of the engineering departments to permanently incorporate sophomore and junior level interdisciplinary design courses into their programs of study. Both courses will be offered beginning in the Fall 1995 semester, and will be structured as one expanded engineering corporation.The challenge that we now face is to structure these courses with a reasonable student to faculty ratio while still maintaining the team teaching approach and the simulated corporate structure. This paper addresses these issues and describes the first offering of the two linked, interdisciplinary design courses.
机译:在过去的几年中,工程课程中的设计受到了相当大的关注。我们在北亚利桑那大学提供的高级岩顶工程设计课程的经验证明,在真实项目中为真正的客户执行的复杂而富挑战性的设计任务具有教育意义。但是,观察设计团队的活动并评估他们的工作成果,可以清楚地表明,学生以强大的分析能力和无限的热情进入高级设计课程,但没有足够的设计经验,处理不确定性,将其作为工作的一部分。团队,并执行一个复杂的项目。为了纠正这种缺乏准备的情况,我们决定在工程课程中进行一些更改,并在1994年秋季学期开设了一个跨学科的二年级设计课程。 [1] 实验课程的结构是一家模拟工程公司,负责设计用于危险品处理的机器人设备。一个由六名教师组成的跨学科团队担任公司总裁,四名部门经理和质量经理的角色。三十三名学生担任设计工程师,公司的每个部门都有来自四个工程学科(电气,机械,土木/环境和计算机科学)中每个学科的两名学生。学院工业顾问委员会的一名成员扮演了我们客户的角色,而我们的校园安全官员扮演了环境保护局代表的角色。该课程涉及技术,法律,道德,财务和人员问题,并解决了信息不完整,资源和物资有限,团队动态以及员工和公共安全方面的问题。通过书面和电子邮件状态报告,设计审查,正式演示以及使用计算机工具进行日程安排,设计和演示来强调沟通和文档编制。本课程以计算机控制的机器人设备的四种不同的工作模型结束 33名学生几乎等不及要参加下一门设计课程。 大二设计课程取得了巨大成功,并导致每个工程部门将大二和初级跨学科设计课程永久地纳入他们的学习课程。这两门课程都将从1995年秋季学期开始提供,并将作为一个扩展的工程公司来组织。 我们现在面临的挑战是如何在合理的师生比例下构建这些课程,同时仍保持团队教学方法和模拟的公司结构。本文解决了这些问题,并介绍了两个相互关联的跨学科设计课程中的第一个课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号