首页> 外文会议>Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists >IMPLEMENTING A STRUCTURED FAILURE ANALYSIS SYSTEM
【24h】

IMPLEMENTING A STRUCTURED FAILURE ANALYSIS SYSTEM

机译:实施结构化故障分析系统

获取原文

摘要

BAGASSE reclaimer failures are traceable from 1991 with multiple failures in 2005 and 2006 prompting a formal investigation into the root cause of failure. The techniques selected for use were Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA). These are common and powerful tools applied by reliability and maintenance engineers involved in the identification of potential hazards, their criticality, and the ultimate cause of failure. The initial analysis failed due its lack of structured methodology and inability to look beyond the accepted cause. This root cause was thought to be simply the introduction of tramp material with little consideration of other possible causes. Following this first analysis, current control was installed on the drive and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) placed upon fuel suppliers to ensure quality fuel. Twenty months later another failure occurred, instigating a comprehensive and structured analysis with the application of FMECA and RCFA. A number of possible failure modes were identified including inadequate systems control, manufacturing flaws, slip-ring failure, and transverse impact loading of the drive chain. Failure after implementation of motor control and KPIs is not attributed to a single root cause but to a combination of poor design, manufacturing defects and flawed maintenance procedures. The welded link chain was replaced with a bolted link configuration in conjunction with routine inspection and maintenance. Chain life is anticipated to return to design life, with a $60 000 cost saving in the 2008/2009 budget. This initiative has faced cultural resistance but with persistence has reaped encouraging results. Rewards extend beyond fiscal integrity with a positive shift in maintenance strategy and attitude.
机译:BAGASSE取料机的故障可追溯到1991年,2005年和2006年发生了多次故障,促使人们对故障的根本原因进行了正式调查。选择使用的技术是“故障模式和后果关键性分析”(FMECA)和“根本原因故障分析”(RCFA)。这些是可靠性和维护工程师使用的通用且功能强大的工具,可用于识别潜在危险,其严重性以及最终的故障原因。由于缺乏结构化的方法以及无法超越公认的原因,初步分析失败了。根本原因被认为是流浪汉材料的简单引入,几乎没有考虑其他可能的原因。经过第一次分析,在驱动器上安装了电流控制,并在燃料供应商上安装了关键性能指标(KPI),以确保燃料质量。二十个月后,又发生了另一次故障,使用FMECA和RCFA进行了全面而结构化的分析。确定了许多可能的故障模式,包括系统控制不足,制造缺陷,滑环故障和传动链的横向冲击载荷。实施电机控制和KPI后的故障不是由单一的根本原因引起的,而是由于不良的设计,制造缺陷和有缺陷的维护程序共同造成的。与常规检查和维护相结合,焊接的链条链被替换为螺栓链节结构。预计链条寿命将恢复设计寿命,在2008/2009年预算中可节省6万美元的成本。该倡议面临文化抵制,但坚持不懈地取得了令人鼓舞的结果。通过积极改变维护策略和态度,奖励不仅限于财政诚信。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号