首页> 外文会议>International conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology;SMiRT 19 >Considerations on the Use of Natural and Artificial Time Histories for Seismic Transient Non- Linear Analyses of Structures and Variability Assessment
【24h】

Considerations on the Use of Natural and Artificial Time Histories for Seismic Transient Non- Linear Analyses of Structures and Variability Assessment

机译:关于使用自然和人工时间历史进行地震瞬态非线性结构分析和变异性评估的考虑

获取原文

摘要

Due to increased potentialities of computers, it is nowadays possible to perform dynamic non-linear computation of structures to evaluate their ultimate behavior under seismic loads using refined finite element models. Nevertheless, one key parameter for such complex computations is the input motion, which may lead to important discrepancies in the results and therefore difficulties to deal with for engineering purpose. In this situation, the opportunity to use artificial time histories or not for such analyses is a still open question.The objective of this study is (i) to give some elements concerning the potential effectiveness of artificial time histories to reproduce structural damages led by real earthquakes, (ii) to quantify variability associated with transient non-linear seismic analyses and (iii) to propose a method to account for this variability for design and verification of structures.For this purpose, some simplified non-linear models are used (reinforced concrete structure with structural NL behavior and PWR core with impact NL behavior). The study is divided in two phases.- Phase 1 : Comparison between natural and artificial time histories for non-linear analyses,- Phase 2 : Quantification of variability associated with non-linear calculations.Results of phase 1 show a very good agreement between natural and artificial time histories computations. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that artificial time histories may be representative of real earthquakes if they are generated base on ground response spectrum and other ground motion parameters (ground velocity, ground displacement, CAV, duration ...), which is a key factor according to our experience. In that context, this paper gives some attenuation relationships to evaluate Ground Motion Parameters based on characteristics of the earthquake under consideration (i.e. magnitude and focal distance).In addition, we observed that the variability on the non-linear parameter is significant and may be different for artificial and natural accelerograms. We were able here to generate artificial time histories with an induced damage variability close to the expected one. The key factor is to allow variability around ground motion parameters using an appropriate generation procedure (which may not be the standard engineering practice).In another hand, the variability induced by natural time histories is significantly higher than the expected one. The main reason comes from the fact that it is not possible to get a relatively high number of natural time histories with characteristics (magnitude and distance) close to the target ones. Consequently, the resulting variability is a combination of the variability coming from the seismic motion itself and the variability coming from earthquake characteristics.Results of phase 2 show that for low number of calculations (typically less than 10), the variability on the average value of the non-linear parameter may be very important depending on the different sets of accelerograms used. In addition, the variability decreases significantly for high number of calculations but the convergence to the average value of the population is low, even for numbers of calculations higher than 50.Finally, a method to account for variability is proposed, based on Student-Fisher statistical estimator and allows to estimate the design parameter with an appropriate confidence level. This method is conservative and leaves a relative freedom to the designer for engineering purpose (more calculations can be performed to get an optimized estimation of the design parameter or a lower number of calculations is possible but with a more conservative estimation of the design parameter).
机译:由于计算机的潜力不断增加,如今可以使用改进的有限元模型对结构进行动态非线性计算,以评估其在地震荷载下的最终性能。尽管如此,用于这种复杂计算的一个关键参数是输入运动,它可能导致结果上的重大差异,从而导致工程上难以处理。在这种情况下,是否使用人工时间历史进行此类分析的机会仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。 这项研究的目的是(i)提供一些有关人工时间历史重现真实地震导致的结构破坏的潜在有效性的要素,(ii)量化与瞬态非线性地震分析有关的变异性,以及(iii)提出建议。一种解决这种变化的方法,用于结构设计和验证。 为此,使用了一些简化的非线性模型(具有结构NL行为的钢筋混凝土结构和具有冲击NL行为的PWR芯)。该研究分为两个阶段。 -第1阶段:自然时间和人工时间历史之间的比较,以进行非线性分析, -阶段2:量化与非线性计算相关的变异性。 第1阶段的结果显示出自然时间历史和人工时间历史计算之间的良好一致性。因此,有可能得出这样的结论:如果人工时间历史是根据地面响应谱和其他地面运动参数(地面速度,地面位移,CAV,持续时间...)生成的,那么它们可以代表真实的地震,这是关键根据我们的经验。在这种情况下,本文给出了一些衰减关系,以便根据所考虑的地震特征(即震级和焦距)来评估地震动参数。 此外,我们观察到非线性参数的可变性很明显,对于人工和自然加速度图可能有所不同。在这里,我们能够生成人工时间历史,其诱发的损伤变异性接近预期的时间变异性。关键因素是使用适当的生成过程(可能不是标准的工程实践)来允许围绕地面运动参数的可变性。 另一方面,自然时间历史引起的变异性明显高于预期。主要原因是这样的事实,即不可能获得相对大量的自​​然时间历史,这些自然历史的特征(幅度和距离)接近目标时间。因此,最终的可变性是来自地震运动本身的可变性和来自地震特征的可变性的组合。 阶段2的结果表明,对于少量的计算(通常少于10个),非线性参数平均值的可变性可能非常重要,具体取决于所使用的加速度计的不同集合。此外,对于大量的计算,变异性显着降低,但即使对于大于50的计算,总体平均值的收敛性也很低。 最后,基于Student-Fisher统计估计量,提出了一种解决可变性的方法,该方法可以用适当的置信度来估计设计参数。这种方法是保守的,并为设计人员留出了相对的自由度以进行工程设计(可以执行更多的计算以获得对设计参数的优化估计,或者可以进行较少的计算,但可以对设计参数进行更保守的估计)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号