首页> 外文会议> >FEATURE-BASED VS. INTENSITY-BASED BRAIN IMAGE REGISTRATION: COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISON USING MUTUAL INFORMATION
【24h】

FEATURE-BASED VS. INTENSITY-BASED BRAIN IMAGE REGISTRATION: COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISON USING MUTUAL INFORMATION

机译:基于功能的VS。基于强度的脑图像注册:使用相互信息的综合比较

获取原文

摘要

We propose a mutual information-based method for quantitative evaluation of the deformable registration algorithms at three levels: global, voxel-wise and anatomical structure. We compare two fully deformable registration algorithms: feature-based HAMMER and a set of intensity-based algorithms (FEM-Demons) in the ITK package. Evaluation is carried out using the AAE template image with 116 labeled anatomical structures and a set of 59 MR brain images: 20 normal controls (CTE), 20 Alzheimer''s disease patients (AD) and 19 mild cognitive impairment patients (MCI). We show that both HAMMER and FEM-Demons perform significantly better than an affine registration algorithm, FLIRT, at all three levels. At the global level, FEM-Demons outperforms HAMMER on the images of AD and MCI patients. At the local and anatomical levels, FEM-Demons and HAMMER dominate each other on different brain regions.
机译:我们提出了一种基于相互信息的基于信息的方法,用于三个水平的可变形登记算法的定量评估:全球性,体素 - 明智和解剖结构。我们比较了两个完全可变形的注册算法:在ITK包装中,基于特征的锤子和一组基于强度的基于强度的算法(Fem-Demons)。使用具有116个标记的解剖结构的AAE模板图像和一组59例脑图像进行评估:20个正常对照(CTE),20 alzheimer的疾病患者(AD)和19名轻度认知障碍患者(MCI)。我们表明,两条锤子和FEM恶魔在所有三个层面都比仿射登记算法更好地表现出明显好。在全球一级,FEM恶魔优于广告和MCI患者的图像上的锤子。在当地和解剖学水平,Fem-Demons和Hammer在不同的脑区互相占据主导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号