首页> 外文会议> >Technology, terrorism, and the multiple perspective approach
【24h】

Technology, terrorism, and the multiple perspective approach

机译:技术,恐怖主义和多角度方法

获取原文

摘要

The multiple perspective concepts, developed in 1977, has proven very useful in bridging the gap between analysis or modeling on the one hand, and the real world on the other. By introducing two perspectives to augment the traditional science/engineering based "technical" (or T) perspective, it has been consistently found that each of the three yields insights on complex sociotechnical systems that cannot be obtained with the others. The two perspectives are the "organizational" (or O) perspective and the "personal" (or P) perspective. Applications have ranged from technology assessment to regional planning to the study of industrial catastrophe. The cross-cuing or integration of the three perspectives on a given system provides an enhances basis for decision making. The recent concern with terrorism strongly suggests the value of adding a fourth perspective, one first briefly mentioned by the author in his 1999 book: the "religious/mythological" (or R) perspective. This paper focuses on the need to consider the R perspective in the context of 21/sup st/ century conflict management.
机译:事实证明,1977年提出的多视角概念对于弥合一方面的分析或建模与另一方面的现实世界之间的差距非常有用。通过引入两种观点来增强传统的基于科学/工程学的“技术”(或T)观点,已经一致地发现,这三种观点中的每一种都对复杂的社会技术系统产生了见解,而其他系统则无法获得这些见解。这两种观点是“组织”(或O)观点和“个人”(或P)观点。应用范围从技术评估到区域规划到工业灾难研究。给定系统上三个视角的交叉提示或集成为决策提供了增强的基础。最近对恐怖主义的关注强烈表明增加第四种观点的价值,这是作者在其1999年的书中简要提到的第一种观点:“宗教/神话”(或R)观点。本文着重于在21世纪/上世纪世纪冲突管理的背景下考虑R观点的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号