首页> 外文会议>Machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition >A Comparison between Haralick s Texture Descriptor and the Texture Descriptor Based on Random Sets for Biological Images
【24h】

A Comparison between Haralick s Texture Descriptor and the Texture Descriptor Based on Random Sets for Biological Images

机译:Haralick的纹理描述符与基于随机集的生物图像纹理描述符的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Texture is a powerful method to describe the appearance of different biological objects in images. The most used texture descriptor is the well-known Haralick's texture descriptor. We propose a texture descriptor based on random sets. This descriptor gives us more freedom in describing different textures. In this paper we compare the two texture descriptors based on a medical data set. We review the theory of the two texture descriptors and describe the procedure for the comparison of the two methods. A medical data set is used that is derived from colon examination. Decision tree induction is used to learn a classifier model. Cross-validation is used to calculate the error rate. The comparison of the two texture descriptors is based on the error rate, the properties of the two best classification models, the runtime for the feature calculation, the selected features, and the semantic meaning of the texture descriptors.
机译:纹理是一种强大的方法,可以描述图像中不同生物对象的外观。最常用的纹理描述符是著名的Haralick的纹理描述符。我们提出了基于随机集的纹理描述符。此描述符为我们提供了更多自由来描述不同的纹理。在本文中,我们基于医学数据集比较了两个纹理描述符。我们回顾了两种纹理描述符的理论,并描述了两种方法比较的过程。使用从结肠检查得出的医学数据集。决策树归纳用于学习分类器模型。交叉验证用于计算错误率。两种纹理描述符的比较基于错误率,两个最佳分类模型的属性,特征计算的运行时间,所选特征以及纹理描述符的语义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号