【24h】

A RECENT COMPARISON OF STYLUS AND OPTICAL METHODS FOR MEASURING SURFACE TEXTURE

机译:触控笔和光学方法测量表面纹理的最新比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Due to the demanding dimensional specifications required by modern precision products a large number of instruments and methods have been developed to establish an appropriate metrology infrastructure. When measuring surface texture (profile, waviness and roughness), the form of the test object is removed, either by some type of mechanical skid device or by digital filtering techniques. Increasingly, engineering surfaces are measured using non-contact optical probing techniques for which there are no international specification standards. This lack of specification standards and other issues of calibration, along with the multitude of transducers available, mean that it is difficult to obtain traceability to the definition of the metre. This paper presents the results of a comparison of optical and stylus instruments.
机译:由于现代精密产品需要严格的尺寸规格,因此已经开发了大量的仪器和方法来建立合适的计量基础设施。在测量表面纹理(轮廓,波纹度和粗糙度)时,可以通过某种类型的机械滑移装置或数字滤波技术去除测试对象的形式。越来越多的工程表面使用非接触式光学探测技术进行测量,而目前国际上尚无标准规范。缺乏规格标准和其他校准问题,以及大量可用的换能器,意味着很难获得对米的定义的可追溯性。本文介绍了光学和触控笔仪器的比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号