首页> 外文会议>International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems >The Consistency of Using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) on Risk Assessment of Information Technology
【24h】

The Consistency of Using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) on Risk Assessment of Information Technology

机译:失效模式影响分析(FMEA)在信息技术风险评估中的一致性

获取原文

摘要

FMEA is a helpful method for analyzing and giving priority to the risks of Information Technology. Even so, FMEA has weaknesses in the consistency of risk assessment results because a variety of dynamic situations. Risk priorities may differ due to the influence of subjectivity and potentially provide inaccuracies in risk management. This study aims to analyze the consistency of risk assessments based on FMEA. The object of risk assessment in this study is a commercial bank in Indonesia conducted by two different teams to test consistent results. This consistency analysis is carried out through (1) gap analysis, and (2) qualitative methods to identify the causes of different risk assessments. This study found that: (1) prioritization methods used, (2) procedures for assessing risks, (3) skills and knowledge of the people or teams involved, and (4) the ability of facilitators to conduct FMEA-based risk assessments are four main things which causes inconsistencies. This study also recommends some improvements or adjustments to the FMEA method according to the conditions of the company.
机译:FMEA是分析和优先考虑信息技术风险的有用方法。即使这样,由于各种动态情况,FMEA在风险评估结果的一致性方面仍存在弱点。由于主观性的影响,风险优先级可能会有所不同,并可能在风险管理中提供不准确之处。本研究旨在分析基于FMEA的风险评估的一致性。这项研究中的风险评估对象是印度尼西亚的一家商业银行,由两个不同的团队进行,以测试一致的结果。这种一致性分析是通过(1)差距分析和(2)定性方法来确定不同风险评估的原因而进行的。这项研究发现:(1)所使用的优先级排序方法,(2)评估风险的程序,(3)有关人员或团队的技能和知识,以及(4)协助者进行基于FMEA的风险评估的能力有四种导致不一致的主要因素。这项研究还建议根据公司的情况对FMEA方法进行一些改进或调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号