首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soft Computing >Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method
【24h】

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method

机译:基于间隔型模糊证据推理方法的风险评估失败模式和效果分析(FMEA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has been widely adopted to define, identity, and remove potential and recognized hazards. As an indicator in traditional FMEA, the risk priority number (RPN) is an effective tool for measuring risk and the calculation of RPN is also very simple. Nevertheless, there are many drawbacks in the conventional FMEA method. It is necessary to seek approaches that can make up for the deficiency of traditional FMEA method and strengthen assessment capability of ranking failure modes according to three relevant risk factors. This paper presents a way to combine interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) with evidential reasoning (ER) method, which is able to overcome some disadvantages of the conventional FMEA approach and deal with uncertainties more efficiently. First, we give a more precise expression of the risk factors in the form of IT2FSs and gain the relative weight of three risk factors. Second, one can judge the failure modes in relation to each risk factors with belief structures. Finally, the ER method is used to combine the belief structures under the weight of the three risk factors. To verify the feasibility of the method, an application for steam valve system is performed and the obtained results show the effectiveness of the method. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:失败模式和效果分析(FMEA)已被广泛采用,以定义,身份和消除潜在和认可的危害。作为传统FMEA中的指标,风险优先级编号(RPN)是测量风险的有效工具,RPN的计算也很简单。然而,传统的FMEA方法中存在许多缺点。有必要寻求弥补传统FMEA方法的缺乏的方法,并根据三种相关风险因素加强排名失败模式的评估能力。本文提出了一种方法,将间隔类型-2模糊集(IT2FSS)与证据推理(ER)方法相结合,能够克服传统的FMEA方法的一些缺点,并更有效地处理不确定性。首先,我们为IT2FSS的形式提供更精确的风险因素,并获得三种风险因素的相对重量。其次,人们可以判断与具有信念结构的每个危险因素相关的失败模式。最后,ER方法用于将信仰结构结合在三种风险因素的重量下。为了验证该方法的可行性,执行蒸汽阀系统的应用,并且获得的结果显示了该方法的有效性。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号