首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management Science Engineering >The influence of institutional executive mode on procedural justice
【24h】

The influence of institutional executive mode on procedural justice

机译:制度执行模式对程序正义的影响

获取原文

摘要

In this study, the pattern of institution of execution is divided into two types, one is institutional determined which means results were determined by institution, and the other is authority determined which means results were determined by authority's decision. The study examines the influence of two institutional executive modes on procedural justice judgment and outcome acceptance. The study use scenarios as experimental material, present the scenarios to the college students, to explore how two sorts of institutional executive mode have effect on procedural justice. Study 1 manipulate institutional executive mode through scenario, the result suggests that when the outcome was determined by institution, the score of the procedural justice judgments and outcome acceptance were significantly higher than the outcome was determined by authority. Study 2 present procedural justice or procedural injustice scene to the participations; invite them to fill in the institutional executive mode questionnaire. The result suggests that under the procedural justice scene, the scores of the institutional determined was significantly higher than the procedural injustice scene. However, under the procedural justice scene, the scores of the authority determined were significantly lower than the procedural injustice scene. The result of the two studies indicate that the degree of the authority participation influence the individual's procedural justice judgments during the institutional executive process. Thus in real organizations, we should strengthen the culture of institutional determined, and in the process of institution implementation, we should pay more attention to the role of the institution itself. Strengthen the scientific and procedural aspect of institution; Improve the effectiveness of institution executive from the institution itself.
机译:在本研究中,执行机构的模式分为两种类型,一种是机构决定的,这意味着结果由机构决定,另一种是权力决定的,这意味着结果取决于权威的决定。该研究考察了两种制度执行模式对程序正义判断和结果接受的影响。本研究以情境为实验材料,向大学生介绍情境,探讨两种制度执行方式对程序公正的影响。研究1通过情境操纵机构执行模式,结果表明,当结果由机构确定时,程序正义判断和结果接受的得分显着高于由权威确定的结果。研究2向参与者介绍了程序正义或程序不公正的场景;邀请他们填写机构执行模式问卷。结果表明,在程序正义场景下,制度确定的得分明显高于程序不公正场景。但是,在程序正义场景下,所确定的权威得分明显低于程序不公正场景。两项研究的结果表明,在机构执行过程中,权威参与的程度会影响个人的程序正义判断。因此,在真实的组织中,我们应该加强制度确定的文化,在制度执行过程中,我们应更加注意制度本身的作用。加强制度的科学和程序方面;从机构本身提高机构执行人员的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号