【24h】

Clarifying Cognitive Flexibility from a Self-regulatory Perspective

机译:从自我调节的角度澄清认知灵活性

获取原文

摘要

Cognitive flexibility is a definitionally varied construct utilized across disciplines that revolves around an individual's ability to suitably adjust to changes in a task-based context [5]. The diversity of disciplines exploring cognitive flexibility have resulted in a number of operationalizations that function more or less optimally depending upon the context in which the construct is measured. Each measurement technique holds both promise toward explicating the nature of this construct while simultaneously stalling progress, as crosstalk between disciplines is stilted. To support this effort in understanding how cognitive flexibility arises, the link between it and self-regulation is structurally explored. This paper reviews findings throughout the literature (1) for different cognitive flexibility definitions and measures (e.g., the Wisconsin Card Sort Task [8], Trail Making Test [19], Cognitive Flexibility Scale [14]), (2) across multiple disciplines (e.g., psychology, management, communications), and (3) within various populations (e.g., clinical, adolescents, young adults, older adults) in an effort to initiate conversation about increasing sensitivity of utilized measures to better analyze and understand results between cognitive flexibility and other key constructs relevant to a work environment (e.g., learning [23]). Lastly, this paper proposes an explanatory link between cognitive flexibility and self-regulation, utilizing Sitzman and Ely's [22] parsimonious framework of self-regulatory learning constructs and Pintrich's [17] four phases of self-regulation as applicable to each measure. This work lays the groundwork for advancing the science underpinning this construct.
机译:认知灵活性是跨学科使用的一种定义上不同的构造,它围绕个人的能力进行适当调整以适应基于任务的情境中的变化[5]。探索认知灵活性的学科的多样性导致了许多可操作的操作,这些操作或多或少地根据构造的测量环境最佳地发挥作用。每种测量技术都希望在阐明该构造的本质的同时,又会拖延进度,因为各学科之间的相互干扰til之以鼻。为了支持这种理解理解灵活性如何产生的努力,从结构上探讨了它与自我调节之间的联系。本文回顾了整个文献中的发现(1)针对不同的认知灵活性定义和措施(例如,威斯康星卡片排序任务[8],跟踪制作测试[19],认知灵活性量表[14]),(2)跨多个学科(例如心理学,管理,沟通),以及(3)不同人群(例如临床,青少年,年轻人,老年人)之间的对话,以期开始就提高所用措施的敏感性进行对话,以更好地分析和理解认知之间的结果灵活性和与工作环境相关的其他关键构造(例如,学习[23])。最后,本文利用Sitzman和Ely [22]的自我调节学习构造的简约框架以及Pintrich [17]的四个阶段的自我调节,提出了一种认知灵活性与自我调节之间的解释性联系。这项工作为推进支撑该结构的科学奠定了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号