首页> 外文会议>Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control V >Linewidth measurement comparison between a photometric optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope backed with Monte Carlo trajectory computations
【24h】

Linewidth measurement comparison between a photometric optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope backed with Monte Carlo trajectory computations

机译:蒙特卡洛轨迹计算支持的光度学光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜之间的线宽测量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract: Linewidth measurements of clear lines on anti-reflection coated photomasks are obtained with a photometric optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Both microscopes have stages fitted with helium-neon laser interferometers and thus provide directly traceable length measurements. In both instruments, measurements of pitches are independent of the choice of image edge intensity threshold, while linewidth measurements are greatly affected by the threshold levels. Simple scalar optical theory predicts that in the absence of aberrations, the position of the edge of a totally opaque film should be at the 25% intensity threshold for coherent illumination. The 50% backscattered electron intensity threshold has proved to be a repeatable point for measurements as it is very insensitive to such parameters as beam diameter, accelerating voltage and exact focus. The relationship between the 50% threshold and the dimensions of the sample itself is obtained with the aid of Monte Carlo electron trajectory calculations. Linewidth measurements made with the two different techniques on the same photomask are presented with particular interest in lines with widths below the resolving power of the optical microscope operated at visible wavelengths and using coherent illumination. The measurement agreement is better than 0.03 $mu@m for lines which are fully resolved and increasingly worse for lines with widths below 0.7 $mu@m. The degree to which theory predicts agreement between the two techniques and the resulting confidence in the SEM measurements are discussed.!
机译:摘要:使用光度学光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)获得抗反射涂层光掩模上清晰线条的线宽测量结果。两种显微镜的镜台均配有氦氖激光干涉仪,因此可直接进行长度测量。在这两种仪器中,间距的测量都与图像边缘强度阈值的选择无关,而线宽的测量则受阈值水平的很大影响。简单的标量光学理论预测,在没有像差的情况下,完全不透明薄膜边缘的位置应在相干照明的25%强度阈值处。 50%的反向散射电子强度阈值已被证明是测量的可重复点,因为它对诸如束直径,加速电压和精确聚焦之类的参数非常不敏感。 50%阈值与样品本身的尺寸之间的关系借助蒙特卡洛电子轨迹计算获得。提出了在相同的光掩模上使用两种不同技术进行的线宽测量,其线宽低于在可见光波长下使用相干照明的光学显微镜的分辨力。对于完全解析的线,测量协议优于0.03μm@m,对于宽度小于0.7μm@m的线,测量协议则越来越差。讨论了理论预测两种技术之间的一致性以及在SEM测量中所产生的置信度的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号