【24h】

Internet Governance : Some Thoughts after the two WSIS

机译:互联网治理:两次WSIS之后的一些思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The challenges faced by the globalisation of our Information Society are numerous and crucial for the future of our democracies. The two WSIS have tried to answer these challenges by proclaiming new rights and overall a new way for governing the Internet. This paper focuses on two major debates: the first one circumvents the right to "Universal Access" viewed as the right for everyone to become a "netizen". This includes participation in the Information Society, which incorporates not only the right to be connected to the infrastructure, not only the right to gain access to the informational richness available on the Net but also the possibility for everybody to take part in the large discussion forum that is the Internet. The discussion about Internet Governance was the major topic at the Tunis Agenda. The WSIS definitively advocated a transparent, multistakeholder and co-regulatory approach. What does this mean? What role might ICANN fulfil - do we need to reform that organisation? Among the stakeholders, particularly the international organisations, who are the real winners and who is losing? Might the EU approach to co-regulation be taken as a model for Internet governance? All these questions are raised, even if they are not solved, in our comments.
机译:信息社会全球化面临的挑战众多,对于我们民主国家的未来至关重要。两家WSIS试图通过宣布新权利和总体上以新的互联网治理方式来应对这些挑战。本文着眼于两个主要辩论:第一个辩论规避了“普遍访问”的权利,该权利被视为每个人都成为“网民”的权利。这包括参与信息社会,它不仅包含连接到基础结构的权利,不仅包含获得网络上可用信息丰富性的权利,而且还包括每个人都有可能参加大型讨论论坛的权利。那就是互联网。关于互联网治理的讨论是突尼斯议程的主要主题。 WSIS明确主张采取透明,多利益相关方和共同监管的方式。这是什么意思? ICANN可以扮演什么角色-我们需要改革该组织吗?在利益相关者,特别是国际组织中,谁是真正的赢家,谁是输家?是否可以将欧盟的共同监管方法作为互联网治理的典范?所有这些问题都在我们的评论中提出,即使没有解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号