首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing >Comparison of Horizontal Precision of Various Aerial Survey Marks in Orthophoto Production
【24h】

Comparison of Horizontal Precision of Various Aerial Survey Marks in Orthophoto Production

机译:正射影像制作中各种航测标记水平精度的比较

获取原文

摘要

Based on MVS-SfM algorithm, the commercial image processing software PhotoScan provides the function of automatic matching of ground marks, such as, circular, square and coded mark. However, the practical plane accuracy between the auto-matching and man-selected is not well-defined. This study is compared the plane accuracy for three types of ground marks under the same variable conditions using practical UAS photogrammetry. When the image processing with three auto-matching marks are examined as well as the wing mark is also used the man-selected to put together to compare the plane accuracy. Overall, the plane accuracy of man-selected wing mark is better than three auto-matching marks in the orthophoto. Meanwhile, the plane accuracy using square mark is better than the rest marks in three auto-matching process. The obtained accuracy result is much close to man-selected wing mark. It is recommended that choosing the auto-matching square mark can be derived the better performance in practical project implementation.
机译:商业图像处理软件PhotoScan基于MVS-SfM算法,提供了自动匹配地面标记(如圆形,正方形和编码标记)的功能。然而,在自动匹配和人工选择之间的实际平面精度尚不明确。这项研究使用实用的UAS摄影测量法比较了在相同可变条件下三种类型的地面标记的平面精度。在检查具有三个自动匹配标记的图像处理以及机翼标记时,也要由人工选择以汇总在一起以比较平​​面精度。总体而言,人选机翼标记的平面精度要比正射影像中的三个自动匹配标记要好。同时,在三个自动匹配过程中,使用正方形标记的平面精度要优于其余标记。所获得的精度结果非常接近人工选择的机翼标记。建议选择自动匹配的正方形标记可以在实际项目实施中获得更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号