首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting >Helpful or Harmful? Examining the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance
【24h】

Helpful or Harmful? Examining the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance

机译:有帮助还是有害?检查中断对任务执行的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Most research on interruptions has shown that they can be disruptive by causing a longer time to complete theprimary task and by causing more errors on the primary task. However, a limited amount of research has shownthat interruptions can actually be beneficial to simple primary tasks, a benefit that has been explained by arousal.We sought to replicate the finding that simple tasks can benefit from interruptions and to examine the specificprocesses that are actually improving as a result of the interruptions. More specifically, reaction time data and eyemovement data were collected to account for motor actions and perceptual processes. Results indicate thatparticipants’ immediate action following the interruption was disrupted. However, participants’ other actionsduring the interruption trials were actually performed faster and with fewer errors as compared to the control. Thisspeed-up is not attributed to faster motor responses, but actually to faster perceptual processing.
机译:大多数关于中断的研究表明,中断可能会导致较长时间来完成主要任务并导致更多错误,从而造成破坏。但是,有限的研究表明,中断实际上可以对简单的主要任务有所帮助,这种好处已经被唤醒引起了解释。由于中断。更具体地说,收集反应时间数据和眼动数据以说明运动行为和知觉过程。结果表明,参与者在中断之后的立即行动遭到了破坏。但是,与对照组相比,参与者在中断试验期间的其他动作实际上执行得更快,错误更少。这种加速不是归因于较快的运动响应,而是归因于较快的感知处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号