首页> 外文会议>Electricity, health and the environment: Comparative assessment in support of decision making >COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER AND OTHER OPTIONS
【24h】

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER AND OTHER OPTIONS

机译:核电经济学和其他选择的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper presents results on comparative costs of alternative energy sources for electricity generation, i.e. nuclear power, fossil fuels and renewable energies, drawing from recent OECD/NEA studies. Both direct costs, environmental costs and other external costs and benefits are dealt with. The alternatives considered are base load power plants capable of substantial contribution to grid connected power supply in the year 2000 or shortly thereafter. The realistic alternatives in OECD countries include advanced coal and gas fired power plants, state-of-the-art and advanced nuclear power plants and some renewable technologies which have reached the stage of commercial development. The direct costs of electricity generation are based upon the constant-money levelized lifetime cost methodology. Direct costs incorporate investments for construction and decommissioning of power plants, O&M costs and fuel cycle costs including waste management and disposal. The costs are calculated using reference performance assumptions regarding in particular lifetimes and load factors of the power plants. An assessment of the environmental costs and benefits and of other externalities is also given. The studies carried out by the OECD/NEA, in co-operation with other international organizations, highlight that the costs of electricity generation are sensitive to the discount rates adopted, the anticipated fossil fuel price trends and policies regarding environmental protection measures and regulations. At a discount rate of 5%, nuclear power would be the cheapest option in most OECD countries. At a discount rate of 10%, nuclear power is projected to retain its overall advantage over fossil fuels in France and Japan. However, at this high discount rate, the gas combined cycle would be the cheapest alternative in several countries. The paper provides detailed comparisons of electricity generation costs and their different components. The paper offers some tentative conclusions on the comparative 'full' costs of electricity generation and points out the need for further research in order to assess more comprehensively all externalities.
机译:本文根据最近的OECD / NEA研究结果,介绍了用于发电的替代能源(即核能,化石燃料和可再生能源)的比较成本结果。直接成本,环境成本以及其他外部成本和收益都得到处理。考虑的替代方案是能够在2000年或之后不久对并网供电做出重大贡献的基本负荷发电厂。经合组织国家的现实替代方案包括先进的燃煤和天然气发电厂,最先进的先进核电厂以及一些已进入商业发展阶段的可再生技术。发电的直接成本基于恒定货币平均寿命成本方法。直接成本包括发电厂建设和退役的投资,运行和维护成本以及包括废物管理和处置在内的燃料循环成本。成本是根据参考性能假设(尤其是电厂的寿命和负载因数)计算得出的。还对环境成本和收益以及其他外部因素进行了评估。经合组织/核能机构与其他国际组织合作进行的研究强调,发电成本对所采用的折现率,预期的化石燃料价格趋势以及有关环境保护措施和法规的政策敏感。以5%的折现率,核电将是大多数经合组织国家中最便宜的选择。核电预计将以10%的折让率保持其在法国和日本相对于化石燃料的整体优势。但是,在这种高折价率的情况下,天然气联合循环将成为几个国家中最便宜的替代方案。本文提供了发电成本及其不同组成部分的详细比较。本文就比较的“全部”发电成本提供了一些初步结论,并指出有必要进行进一步研究,以便更全面地评估所有外部因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号