【24h】

Workshop Summary

机译:研讨会总结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A growing number of transportation agencies are embracing performance measurement as a management tool, but few agencies use performance measurement across the full range of their activities, and the existing measurement systems have not been externally validated. The practice of performance measurement is more art than science, and the development of performance measurement systems is a dynamic, incremental process that is still early in its evolution. There is neither one right set of performance measures nor one right process to develop a performance measurement system. However, the structure of performance measurement systems appears to be most effective when it is tiered from broader to more detailed measures for use at different decision-making levels. Most performance measures relate to traditional engineering areas such as pavements, bridges, and traffic flow. Some agencies are being challenged to consider broader measures, such as sustainability and quality of life, creating a wide range of practice in the field. This diversity reflects the unique social and political environments that affect agencies. "One size fits all" does not apply to the field of performance measurement.
机译:越来越多的运输机构将绩效评估作为一种管理工具,但是很少有代理商在其整个活动范围内使用绩效评估,并且现有的评估系统尚未得到外部验证。绩效评估的实践更多是艺术而不是科学,绩效评估系统的开发是一个动态的,渐进的过程,尚处于发展初期。开发绩效评估系统既没有一套正确的绩效衡量标准,也没有正确的过程。但是,绩效衡量系统的结构在从更广泛的衡量指标到更详细的衡量指标以供不同决策级别使用时,似乎是最有效的。大多数性能指标都与传统工程领域有关,例如人行道,桥梁和交通流量。一些机构面临挑战,要考虑更广泛的措施,例如可持续性和生活质量,从而在该领域产生广泛的实践。这种多样性反映了影响代理机构的独特社会和政治环境。 “一刀切”适用于绩效考核领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号