首页> 外文会议>Conference on Laser Florence 2001: A Window on the Laser Medicine World, Nov 7-11, 2001, Florence, Italy >Comparison of coronal leakage after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser
【24h】

Comparison of coronal leakage after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser

机译:EDTA或Er:YAG激光去除涂片层后冠状漏血的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study determined, in vitro, the coronal leakage of root canals evaluating the effect of smear layer removal by either EDTA or laser. Two sealers were also compared. Sixty-four canines were instrumented with the step-back technique and irrigated with 10 ml of 1% sodium hypochlorite. In Group 1, 10 teeth were sealed with Sealer 26~(~R) and 10 teeth were sealed with Grossman cement with no attempt of smear layer removal. Group 2 received a final irrigation of 15 ml of 17% EDTA, and was sealed as in Group 1. Group 3 received Er: YAG laser application (140 mJ, 15 Hz and 42 J), and sealed as in Group 1. Root canals sealed with Sealer 26 had significantly less coronal leakage than Grossman cement (p<0.05). Coronal leakage after smear layer removal with 17% EDTA or Er:YAG laser was not statistically different (p>0.01).
机译:这项研究在体外确定了根管的冠状漏出,评估了通过EDTA或激光清除涂片层的效果。还比较了两个封口机。用后退技术对64只犬进行检测,并用10 ml 1%的次氯酸钠进行灌溉。在第1组中,用Sealer 26〜(〜R)密封10颗牙齿,用Grossman水泥密封10颗牙齿,而未尝试去除涂抹层。第2组接受15 ml 17%EDTA的最终冲洗,并按第1组密封。第3组接受Er:YAG激光照射(140 mJ,15 Hz和42 J),并按第1组密封。用Sealer 26密封的冠状漏血明显少于Grossman水泥(p <0.05)。用17%EDTA或Er:YAG激光清除涂片层后的冠状漏出率无统计学差异(p> 0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号