首页> 外文会议>Computer Modelling and Simulation, 2009. UKSIM '09 >Empirical Analysis of Using Weighted Sum Fitness Functions in NSGA-II for Many-Objective 0/1 Knapsack Problems
【24h】

Empirical Analysis of Using Weighted Sum Fitness Functions in NSGA-II for Many-Objective 0/1 Knapsack Problems

机译:NSGA-II中使用加权和适应度函数处理多目标0/1背包问题的经验分析

获取原文

摘要

Handling of many-objective problems is a hot issue in the evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) community. It is well-known that frequently-used EMO algorithms such as NSGA-II and SPEA do not work well on many-objective problems whereas they have been successfully applied to a large number of test problems and real-world application tasks with two or three objectives. The main difficulty in the handling of many-objective problems is that almost all solutions in the current population of an EMO algorithm are non-dominated with each other. This means that Pareto dominance relation cannot generate enough selection pressure toward the Pareto front. As a result, Pareto dominance-based EMO algorithms such as NSGA-II and SPEA cannot drive the current population toward the Pareto front efficiently in a high-dimensional objective space of a many-objective problem. A simple idea for introducing additional selection pressure toward the Pareto front is the use of scalarizing fitness functions. In this paper, we examine the effect of using weighted sum fitness functions for parent selection and generation update on the performance of NSGA-II for many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems.
机译:在进化多目标优化(EMO)社区中,处理多目标问题是一个热门问题。众所周知,经常使用的EMO算法(例如NSGA-II和SPEA)不能很好地解决多目标问题,而已成功地将其应用到大量的测试问题和具有两个或三个条件的实际应用任务中目标。处理多目标问题的主要困难是,当前EMO算法中的几乎所有解决方案都不是相互主导的。这意味着帕累托优势关系不能向帕累托前沿产生足够的选择压力。结果,在多目标问题的高维目标空间中,诸如NSGA-II和SPEA之类的基于帕累托优势的EMO算法无法有效地将当前群体推向帕累托前沿。向Pareto前端引入附加选择压力的简单想法是使用标度适应度函数。在本文中,我们研究了使用加权和适应度函数进行父母选择和世代更新对多目标0/1背包问题的NSGA-II性能的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号