首页> 外文会议>ASME/ASCE/IEEE joint rail conference 2011 >Sensitivity Analysis of Track Maintenance Strategies for the High Speed Rail (HSR) Services
【24h】

Sensitivity Analysis of Track Maintenance Strategies for the High Speed Rail (HSR) Services

机译:高铁(HSR)轨道维护策略的敏感性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Track Maintenance (TM) is one of the critical parts of rail operations and asset management. It has been estimated that about 25-35 % of all operational costs are related to the track maintenance performance which can be typically classified as either corrective maintenance (CM) or preventive maintenance (PM). The first is a more reactive approach, where maintenance is conducted when inspections have revealed a need for action. The latter is a strategic approach that is mainly applied through maintenance planning. High Speed Rail (HSR) systems, especially on shared HSR corridors, can complicate track maintenance conditions due to the tight tolerances and precision, reliability and safety issues required by HSR. This paper evaluates strategic approaches for track maintenance planning along selected HSR corridors with either shared or dedicated operation pattern. The paper uses analytical and descriptive parameter tables to evaluate how sensitive a corridor is to changes in essential criteria for developing track maintenance strategies (TMS). These criteria may include: 1. HSR traffic conditions and operations regime 2. TMS approach (or strategy) on current rail lines connected to the new HSR line 3. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) structure of HSR management system The descriptive parameter tables have been used by a specific PM modeling approach called preventive maintenance scheduling problem (PMSP). Before running PMSP model over a designated line, the respective parameters of the model should be calibrated and analyzed based on the line specifications. The descriptive parameter tables can be used during calibration procedure to assist in analyzing the sensitivity of model's parameters and variables for the above mentioned criteria. This paper discusses and compares TMS approaches on three planned HSR corridors in Europe (Lisbon-Madrid HSR), Asia (Tehran-Isfahan HSR) and USA (California HSR). All three HSR rail corridors are under development, but each presents specific sensitivities to the given PM model's parameters that can affect track maintenance strategic planning along these corridors. We concluded that TMS model calibration by these descriptive analytical tables can assist maintenance strategic planners in identifying different TMS approaches when dealing with maintenance contractors, HSR operators and public rail authorities.
机译:轨道维护(TM)是铁路运营和资产管理的关键部分之一。据估计,所有运营成本中约25-35%与轨道维护性能有关,通常可将其分为纠正性维护(CM)或预防性维护(PM)。第一种是更具反应性的方法,其中当检查显示需要采取措施时进行维护。后者是一种战略方法,主要通过维护计划来应用。高铁(HSR)系统,特别是在共享的HSR走廊上,由于HSR要求严格的公差以及精度,可靠性和安全性问题,因此会使轨道维护条件复杂化。本文评估了采用共享或专用运营模式沿选定的高铁走廊进行轨道维护计划的战略方法。本文使用分析性和描述性参数表来评估走廊对制定轨道维护策略(TMS)的基本标准的敏感程度。这些标准可能包括:1.高铁交通状况和运营体制2.连接到新高铁的当前铁路线上的TMS方法(或策略)3.高铁管理系统的运营和维护(O&M)结构由称为预防性维护计划问题(PMSP)的特定PM建模方法使用。在指定线路上运行PMSP模型之前,应根据线路规格对模型的各个参数进行校准和分析。描述性参数表可在校准过程中使用,以帮助分析上述标准的模型参数和变量的敏感性。本文讨论并比较了欧洲(里斯本-马德里高铁),亚洲(德黑兰-伊斯法罕高铁)和美国(加利福尼亚高铁)的三个计划高铁走廊的TMS方法。所有三个高铁铁路走廊都在开发中,但是每个都对给定的PM模型参数表现出特定的敏感性,这些参数会影响沿这些走廊的轨道维护战略规划。我们得出的结论是,这些描述性分析表对TMS模型进行的校准可以帮助维修策略规划人员在与维修承包商,高铁运营商和公共铁路当局打交道时确定不同的TMS方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号