首页> 外文会议>ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2007 >ON THE ACCURACY AND COMPUTATIONAL COSTS OF THE ABSOLUTE NODAL COORDINATE AND THE FLOATING FRAME OF REFERENCE FORMULATION IN DEFORMABLE MULTIBODY SYSTEMS
【24h】

ON THE ACCURACY AND COMPUTATIONAL COSTS OF THE ABSOLUTE NODAL COORDINATE AND THE FLOATING FRAME OF REFERENCE FORMULATION IN DEFORMABLE MULTIBODY SYSTEMS

机译:变形多体系统绝对节点坐标的精确度和计算成本以及参考公式的浮动框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the present paper, a comparison of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) and the floating frame of reference formulation (FFRF) is performed for standard static and dynamic problems, both in the small and large deformation regime. Special emphasis is laid on the converged solutions and a comparison to analytical and numerical solutions from the literature. In addition to the work of previous authors, the computational performance of both formulations is studied for the dynamic case, where detailed information is provided concerning the different effects influencing the single parts of the computation time. In case of the ANCF finite element, a planar formulation based on the Bernoulli-Euler theory is utilized, consisting of two position and two slope coordinates in each node only. In the FFRF beam finite element, the displacements are described by the rigid body motion and a small superimposed transverse deflection. The latter is described by means of two static modes for the rotation at the boundary and a user-defined number of eigenmodes of the clamped-clamped beam. In numerical studies, the accuracy and computational costs of the two formulations are compared for a cantilever beam, a pendulum and a slider-crank mechanism. It turns out that both formulations have comparable performance and that the choice of the optimal formulation depends on the problem configuration. Recent claims in the literature that the ANCF would have deficiencies compared to the FFRF thus can be refuted.
机译:在本文中,对于标准的静态和动态问题,无论是小变形还是大变形,都对绝对节点坐标公式(ANCF)和参考公式的浮动框架(FFRF)进行了比较。特别强调了收敛解以及与文献中的解析解和数值解的比较。除了以前的作者的工作之外,还针对动态情况研究了两种公式的计算性能,其中提供了有关影响计算时间单个部分的不同影响的详细信息。在使用ANCF有限元的情况下,将使用基于Bernoulli-Euler理论的平面公式,该平面公式仅在每个节点中包含两个位置和两个斜率坐标。在FFRF光束有限元中,位移由刚体运动和较小的叠加横向挠度描述。后者是通过两个静态模式进行描述的,该静态模式用于在边界处旋转,以及用户定义的多个固定模束的本征模。在数值研究中,针对悬臂梁,摆锤和曲柄滑块机构比较了两种公式的准确性和计算成本。事实证明,这两种配方都具有可比的性能,最佳配方的选择取决于问题的配置。因此,可以反驳文献中有关ANCF与FFRF相比有缺陷的最新说法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号