首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society(HFES 2007); 20071001-05; Baltimore,MA(US) >Revisiting an Old Question with a New Technology: Gender Differences on a Neuro-Cognitive Temporal Tracking Task
【24h】

Revisiting an Old Question with a New Technology: Gender Differences on a Neuro-Cognitive Temporal Tracking Task

机译:用新技术重温旧问题:神经认知时间追踪任务的性别差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Gender differences exist, but the strength and importance of those differences is debatable. This study examined differences in performance among men (n = 64) and women (n = 56) on 14 neuro-cognitive temporal tasks. No adult norms exist for these tasks. Therefore, the goals were to 1) record and compare scores achieved by men and women, and 2) investigate differences in terms of performance (grade point average and physical fitness score) during Army Health Care Specialist Advanced Individual Training (AIT). Descriptive statistics and t-tests identified and compared scores by gender, while IM scores and performance relationships were explored with Pearson product-moment correlations and regression analysis. Men's temporal responses were closer to the reference beat than women's on 14.3% of tasks (p< 0.05). There were no significant relationships between temporal responses and physical fitness performance scores and only two correlations between temporal responses and grade point average (right hand tapping, Task Average and Super Right On (percent within ±15ms of the target beat) (r= 0.189, p = 0.04; and r= 0.20, p = 0.03). While this research upheld findings of differences between men and women in temporal abilities, the differences did not impact functional performance during AIT.
机译:存在性别差异,但是这些差异的强度和重要性值得商bat。这项研究检查了男性(n = 64)和女性(n = 56)在14种神经认知时间任务上的表现差异。对于这些任务,没有成人规范。因此,目标是1)记录并比较男性和女性所获得的分数,以及2)调查在陆军卫生保健专家高级个人培训(AIT)期间在表现方面的差异(平均绩点和体能分数)。描述性统计数据和t检验确定并比较了按性别划分的得分,而IM得分和绩效之间的关系则通过Pearson乘积矩相关性和回归分析进行了探索。在14.3%的任务上,男性的时间反应比女性的时间反应更接近参考搏动(p <0.05)。时间反应与体能表现得分之间没有显着关系,时间反应与平均成绩之间只有两个相关性(右手轻拍,任务平均和超级右开(百分比在目标心跳的±15ms内))(r = 0.189, p = 0.04; r = 0.20,p = 0.03)尽管这项研究支持男女在时间能力上的差异,但差异并未影响AIT期间的功能表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号