首页> 外文会议>Advances in X-ray analysis >COMPARISON OF LABORATORY-BASED X-RAY MICRODIFFRACTION AND ELECTRON BACKSCATTER DIFFRACTION FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF LABORATORY-BASED X-RAY MICRODIFFRACTION AND ELECTRON BACKSCATTER DIFFRACTION FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION

机译:基于实验室的X射线微衍射和电子背散射衍射相识别的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

X-ray microdiffraction and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) have been compared by analysis of a number of materials, including nanocrystalline particles, thin films, and plasma-sprayed (Zr,Y)O_(2-x). EBSD is capable of phase identification of single particles down to approximately 100 nm in size, and x-ray microdiffraction is capable of phase identification of powders down to tenths of nanograms in mass. EBSD is clearly the better technique for the identification of individual small particles, but cannot be used when all the particles (crystallites) are less than 100 nm in size. X-ray microdiffraction has better precision in the determination of lattice constants, which is important in the case of plasma-sprayed (Zr,Y)O_(2-x).
机译:X射线微衍射和电子背散射衍射(EBSD)已通过分析多种材料进行了比较,包括纳米晶体颗粒,薄膜和等离子喷涂(Zr,Y)O_(2-x)。 EBSD能够对尺寸低至约100 nm的单个颗粒进行相识别,而X射线微衍射技术则可以对质量低至十分之一纳克的粉末进行相识别。 EBSD显然是识别单个小颗粒的更好技术,但是当所有颗粒(微晶)的尺寸均小于100 nm时,则无法使用EBSD。 X射线微衍射在确定晶格常数方面具有更高的精度,这在等离子喷涂(Zr,Y)O_(2-x)的情况下非常重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Advances in X-ray analysis 》|2000年|p.69-74|共6页
  • 会议地点 Denver CO(US);Denver CO(US)
  • 作者单位

    Chemical Sciences and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8371;

    rnChemical Sciences and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8371;

    rnMaterials Characterization, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1405;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 X射线、紫外线、红外线 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号