【24h】

ROLE OF ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS IN EVALUATING INNOVATIV DESIGNS

机译:可接受的解决方案在评估创新设计中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A lot of efforts has been invested internationally in support of the introduction in several countries of performance-based building regulatory systems. A performance-based system relies on clearly expressed goals/objectives and functional requirements, which are generally expressed in qualitative terms. Key to a performance-based system is a set of quantitative and measurable performance criteria appropriately linked to the qualitative portion of the system. Some areas of building regulations such as energy conservation, structural design, sound insulation, and some aspects of fire safety currently benefit from sufficient knowledge to support the expression of performance criteria in quantitative and measurable terms. Several areas however do not benefit from such knowledge, namely those areas of building regulations related to personal hygiene, comfort and well-being of people, access and movement of people - including people with disabilities, safety of people from injury, aspects of fire safety-more particularly those related to prevention of fires and human behavior in fire emergencies. The absence of quantitative and measurable performance criteria is these areas creates a need for alternate methods and tools to determine―and verify - the acceptable level of performance in order to satisfy society's expectations as expressed in the goals/objectives and performance requirements of the regulations. Several methods and tools have been developed and their use varies from one country to another. Expert judgment, historical in-service performance, statistical evidence, approved calculations, test methods, models and simulations are examples of such methods and tools that may be used to determine and verify performance of a building design. Another method relies on comparison of a proposed building design with acceptable solutions, those solutions (essentially - but not exclusively - prescriptive specifications) that are deemed to comply with building regulations. This is the method privileged by Canada in developing its objective-based codes concept.
机译:国际上已经进行了很多努力,以支持在几个国家引入基于性能的建筑法规体系。基于绩效的系统依赖于明确表达的目标/目的和功能要求,这些要求通常以定性形式表达。基于性能的系统的关键是与系统的定性部分适当链接的一组定量和可测量的性能标准。当前,建筑法规的某些领域(例如节能,结构设计,隔音和消防安全的某些方面)受益于足够的知识,以定量和可衡量的方式支持性能标准的表达。但是,有几个领域没有从这些知识中受益,即与个人卫生,人员的舒适和福祉,人员的出入和活动有关的建筑法规领域,包括残疾人,受伤人员的安全,消防安全等方面-特别是与在火灾紧急情况下预防火灾和人类行为有关的措施。由于缺乏量化和可衡量的绩效标准,因此这些领域需要一种替代方法和工具来确定并验证可接受的绩效水平,以满足法规目标/目标和绩效要求中所表达的社会期望。已经开发了几种方法和工具,它们的使用因国家而异。专家判断,历史服务表现,统计证据,认可的计算,测试方法,模型和模拟是可用于确定和验证建筑设计性能的此类方法和工具的示例。另一种方法是将提议的建筑设计与可接受的解决方案进行比较,这些解决方案(本质上但不是排他性的说明性规范)被认为符合建筑法规。这是加拿大在开发其基于目标的代码概念时所特有的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号