【24h】

Just a cog in the machine?

机译:机器里只是一个齿轮?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper attempts to demonstrate that the philosophy of technology grounded in the humanities has relevance for practising technologists. Technologists occupy a problematic role in the philosophy of technology. On the one hand their privileged position vis-a-vis technology appears to offer them a powerful role in shaping the development of technology. On the other, the philosophical discourse (and indeed the wider discourse of the humanities) often limits them to being mere cogs in a broader sociotechnical machinery. The extent to which technology is deterministic has been a recurrent question in the philosophy of technology, with responses including substantivism, instrumentalism, developmentalism and critical theory. In this paper we consider how differing philosophical views with respect to the question of technological determinism may give rise to different understandings of the role of the technologist, and outline some possible implications for technologists.
机译:本文试图证明,以人文科学为基础的技术哲学与实践技术人员有关。技术人员在技术哲学中扮演着有问题的角色。一方面,他们相对于技术的特权地位似乎为他们在塑造技术发展中发挥了强大的作用。另一方面,哲学话语(乃至人文科学的更广泛话语)通常将它们限制为仅仅是更广泛的社会技术机器中的齿轮。技术确定性的程度一直是技术哲学中的一个经常性问题,其回应包括实体主义,工具主义,发展主义和批判理论。在本文中,我们考虑关于技术决定论问题的不同哲学观点如何引起对技术专家作用的不同理解,并概述对技术专家的一些可能含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号