首页> 外文会议>2012 Frontiers in Education Conference. >Team learning developing interdisciplinary project teams
【24h】

Team learning developing interdisciplinary project teams

机译:团队学习发展跨学科项目团队

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Teachers of STEM students and employers of graduates recognize that success in many professions requires effective multi-disciplinary team performance. While there is abundant evidence that having "diversity" on a team can contribute to greater creativity and innovation, it is not clear how a group of individuals come to function as a team or how they learn from one other [1,2]. To better understand how university students learn in multi-disciplinary teams, 256 undergraduate students participating in teams in the spring of 2010 at a Midwest university were studied. Data collection included self-reported efficacy for cross-disciplinary team learning (CDTL), as well as self-reported attitudes toward team processes and outcomes, and individual characteristics. During the course of the semester, overall self-efficacy for CDTL increased across all respondents. However, a large number of individual students also displayed decreases in self-efficacy from the beginning to the end of the semester. A previously developed framework for CDTL [2] was further tested and modified as part of this study. Individuals with a high “identity” score at the start of the semester tended to report a smaller increase in this score at the end semester, probably for two reasons: they had less room for improvement, and greater likelihood of overestimating their abilities at the start. Several other findings related to team processes and characteristics were identified and will be discussed.
机译:STEM学生的老师和毕业生的雇主认识到,许多专业的成功需要有效的多学科团队绩效。尽管有大量证据表明,团队中的“多样性”可以促进更大的创造力和创新,但尚不清楚一群人如何以团队的形式发挥作用或如何相互学习[1,2]。为了更好地了解大学生如何在多学科团队中学习,我们对2010年春季在中西部大学参加团队学习的256名本科生进行了研究。数据收集包括自我报告的跨学科团队学习(CDTL)功效,以及自我报告的对团队过程和成果的态度以及个人特征。在本学期中,所有受访者对CDTL的总体自我效能均有所提高。但是,从学期开始到学期结束,大量个体学生的自我效能感也有所下降。作为该研究的一部分,进一步测试和修改了先前开发的CDTL框架[2]。在学期开始时具有较高“同一性”分数的个人倾向于在学期末报告该分数的增幅较小,这可能是由于两个原因:他们的进步空间较小,而在开始时就高估了自己的能力。确定了与团队流程和特征有关的其他一些发现,并将进行讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号