首页> 外文OA文献 >The Constitutional Protection of Trade Secrets and Patents under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009
【2h】

The Constitutional Protection of Trade Secrets and Patents under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009

机译:2009年生物制品价格竞争与创新法对商业秘密和专利的宪法保护

摘要

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“Biosimilars Act”) 1 is for the field of pharmaceutical products the single most important legislative development since passage of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (“Hatch-Waxman Act”),2 on which portions of the Biosimilars Act are clearly patterned. Congress revised section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) to create a pathway for FDA approval of “biosimilar” biological products. Each biosimilar applicant is required to cite in its application a “reference product” that was approved on the basis of a full application containing testing data and manufacturing information, which is owned and was submitted by another company and much of which constitutes trade secret information subject to constitutional protection. Because the Biosimilars Act authorizes biosimilar applicants to cite these previously approved applications, the implementation of the new legislative scheme raises critical issues under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, pursuant to which private property—trade secrets included—may not be taken for public use, without “just compensation.” FDA must confront those issues as it implements the scheme set out in the Biosimilars Act. This article will discuss these issues, after providing a brief overview of the Biosimilars Act and a more detailed examination of the law of trade secrets.
机译:2009年《生物制剂价格竞争和创新法案》(“生物仿制药法案”)1是药品领域自1984年《药品价格竞争和专利期限恢复法案》(《哈奇-瓦克斯曼法案》)通过以来最重要的立法发展),2仿制了《生物仿制药法》的某些部分。国会修订了《公共卫生服务法》(PHSA)第351条,为FDA批准“生物仿制药”生物产品创造了途径。每个生物仿制药申请人都必须在其申请中引用一种“参考产品”,该产品是在包含测试数据和制造信息的完整申请的基础上批准的,该申请由另一家公司拥有并提交,其中大部分构成商业秘密信息主体宪法保护。由于《生物仿制药法》授权生物仿制药申请者引用这些先前批准的申请,因此新的立法计划的实施引发了《宪法第五修正案》中的关键问题,根据该修正案,私有财产(包括商业机密)不得用于公共用途,没有“公正的补偿”。 FDA在执行《生物仿制药法案》中规定的计划时必须面对这些问题。在简要概述了《生物仿制药法》并更详细地研究了商业秘密法之后,本文将讨论这些问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Epstein Richard;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号