首页> 外文OA文献 >Western and Indian theories of consciousness confronted A comparative overview of continental and analytic philosophy with Advaita Vedanta and Madhyamaka Buddhism
【2h】

Western and Indian theories of consciousness confronted A comparative overview of continental and analytic philosophy with Advaita Vedanta and Madhyamaka Buddhism

机译:西方和印度的意识理论面临大陆和分析哲学与advaita Vedanta和madhyamaka佛教的比较概述

摘要

The burgeoning field of cognitive studies in the West is motivated by a renewed interest inconscious experience, which arose in the postmodern zeitgeist in response to the positivist,scientific ideal of objectivity. This work presents a historical overview of Western philosophyfrom its dawn, focusing on the evolution of key concepts in metaphysics, ontology andepistemology, to arrive at the examination of modern theories on consciousness.The monist systems of pre-Socratic philosophers, the empiricism and rationalism of theHumanism, Kant’s critique and the post-Kantian split of traditions in the analytic and continentalbranches are surveyed. A summary of the key historical concepts of consciousness in thecontinental tradition, and especially in German idealism and phenomenology is presented.Modern physicalist theories of mind based on epistemological realism, in the analytic traditionare sketched, and critical aspects of the realist viewpoint discussed. The reintroduction of thephenomenal perspective in philosophy of mind, is argued, represents an important turning pointin analytic philosophy.In the second part, the philosophic-religious traditions of Advaita Vedanta and MahayanaBuddhism, in its Madhyamaka branch, are presented, and their respective notions of self, mind and reality confronted. The concept of consciousness as an ontological substance is, inBuddhism, deconstructed through the analysis of impermanence and interdependent originationof phenomena. In Advaita philosophy consciousness is equated with the universal Brahman, although no duality is admitted between Brahman and the world. The phenomenological analysis of self in this tradition differs from the Western notion of “transcendental ego” through an understanding of intentionality as a superimposition of subject-object duality on pure consciousness. A core theory of nonduality between the conscious principle and the world is then extracted from the apparently opposite ontological stances of Mahayana and Advaita.This theory is finally compared with the Western idealist and realist conceptions ofconsciousness, intentionality and subject-object duality. The nondualism of the Indian systems,is argued, represents a possible resolution of the ontological and epistemological problems ofWestern philosophy.
机译:西方认知研究领域的蓬勃发展是受到新的兴趣意识体验的推动,这种兴趣意识是在后现代时代精神中响应客观主义的实证主义科学理想而产生的。这项工作从黎明开始就对西方哲学进行了历史回顾,着重于形而上学,本体论和认识论等关键概念的演变,以期对现代意识理论进行考察。前苏格拉底哲学家的一元论体系,经验主义和理性主义考察了人类主义,康德的批判以及后分支在分析和大陆分支中的传统分裂。总结了欧洲大陆传统,尤其是德国唯心主义和现象学中意识的关键历史概念。概述了基于认识论现实主义的现代物理主义心理理论,分析传统,并讨论了现实主义观点的关键方面。有人认为,精神哲学现象观的重新引入是分析哲学的一个重要转折点。第二部分,介绍了Advaita Vedanta和大乘佛教的宗教宗教传统,并在其Madhyamaka分支中进行了介绍,并阐述了它们各自的观念。面对自我,思想和现实。在佛教中,意识是本体论概念的概念,是通过对现象的无常和相互依存的分析而解构的。尽管在婆罗门与世界之间没有任何二重性,但在《阿德瓦塔》中,哲学意识等同于普遍的婆罗门。在这种传统中,自我的现象学分析与西方的“先验自我”概念不同,它通过将意向性理解为纯粹意识上主客二重性的叠加。然后从大乘和阿德瓦塔的明显相反的本体论立场中提取了意识原则与世界之间的非对偶性核心理论,并将该理论与西方的唯心主义和现实主义意识,意向性和客体对偶性概念进行了比较。有人认为,印度体系的非二元论是对西方哲学的本体论和认识论问题的可能解决。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cossellu Michele;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号