首页> 外文OA文献 >Hands-On Online? An Investigation of Experiential Design Education With Online Resources
【2h】

Hands-On Online? An Investigation of Experiential Design Education With Online Resources

机译:动手在线?网络资源对体验式设计教育的调查研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Online education is becoming more prevalent in every field, especially with the advent of MOOCs and initiatives such as Coursera, Edx, MITx, Khan Academy and more. Product design education involves open-ended problem solving and prototyping with physical materials, so it presents a number of interesting challenges in an online educational setting.This paper describes an initial study to better understand the value proposition of offering hands-on product design education using different delivery methods, ranging from hands-on residential to fully online, and combinations in-between. A series of two-day workshops were used to teach students typical introductory product design coursework including opportunity identification and early-stage prototyping. Students attended one workshop session that was taught with one of three content delivery types: traditional (n = 9), online (n = 9), or hybrid (n = 8). Each student worked individually to identify a product opportunity and produce a preliminary prototype. The performance of the students was compared to elucidate any differences based on workshop delivery method.Based on the comparison of student work, as evaluated by academic product design experts, there were no statistically significant differences in performance between groups. This result suggests that all delivery methods have potential for successfully transferring knowledge to students. Furthermore, this preliminary evidence warrants more detailed investigations of the effects of delivery method on product design education. Interesting observations regarding workshop attendance identify motivation to complete courses as a point of interest in both residential and online settings. A number of insights gained and possible directions are discussed.
机译:在线教育在每个领域都变得越来越普遍,尤其是随着MOOC和诸如Coursera,Edx,MITx,Khan Academy等倡议的出现。产品设计教育涉及开放式问题解决和使用物理材料进行原型设计,因此在在线教育环境中提出了许多有趣的挑战。本文介绍了一项初步研究,目的是更好地理解使用以下方法提供产品实践教育的价值主张:不同的交付方式,从动手住宅到完全在线,以及两者之间的组合。一系列为期两天的讲习班被用来教给学生典型的入门产品设计课程,包括机会识别和早期原型制作。学生参加了一次讲习班,讲授了以下三种内容交付类型之一:传统(n = 9),在线(n = 9)或混合(n = 8)。每个学生单独工作以发现产品机会并产生初步的原型。比较学生的表现以阐明基于讲习班交付方式的任何差异。根据学生工作的比较(由学术产品设计专家评估),两组之间的表现没有统计学上的显着差异。这个结果表明,所有的传递方法都有成功地将知识传递给学生的​​潜力。此外,该初步证据还需要更详细地研究交付方法对产品设计教育的影响。关于车间出勤率的有趣观察表明,完成课程的动机是住宅和在线环境中的一个兴趣点。讨论了获得的许多见解和可能的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号