首页> 外文OA文献 >EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR); EFSA Scientific Opinion on the science behind the revision of the guidance document on dermal absorption
【2h】

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR); EFSA Scientific Opinion on the science behind the revision of the guidance document on dermal absorption

机译:EFsa植物保护产品及其残留物小组(ppR); EFsa关于修订皮肤吸收指导文件背后的科学的科学意见

摘要

This opinion provides the relevant data, evaluations and references that support the criteria proposed in the new draft guidance needed to facilitate assessment of dermal absorption of plant protection products (PPPs) under Directive 91/414/EEC4 and Regulation (EC) No 1107/20095. The new guidance will be finalised and published only after adoption and publication of this opinion. This opinion has been developed after a public consultation of EFSA on the current guidance document and an outsourced project carried out by the UK Chemicals Regulation Directorate (CRD, 2010). It is not intended to be an exhaustive review but builds on existing documents to which the reader is referred to, and addresses in more detail elements that are specifically relevant for the assessment of dermal absorption of plant protection products. It contains an overview on skin and substance properties and other determinants that have an impact on absorption, a description of important elements in the design of experimental studies and an analysis of available data on dermal absorption of PPPs. The PPR Panel concludes that assessment of dermal absorption in the absence of specific studies can be performed based on default values that the Panel derived from the analysis of the available databases. Elements for a tiered approach are described and commented on. The PPR Panel also concludes that in vitro human studies can be used as a stand alone test for assessment of dermal absorption. The Panel indicates some additional requirements to adapt existing OECD test guidelines to the special requirements of PPPs and their formulations. A harmonised reporting of the studies is also considered important. Some areas where further research could usefully be conducted have been identified.
机译:该意见提供了相关数据,评估和参考,以支持新的指导草案中建议的标准,该标准有助于根据第91/414 / EEC4号指令和第1107/20095号法规(EC)评估植物保护产品(PPP)的皮肤吸收。只有在采纳和发表此意见后,新指南才能最终定稿和发布。在欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)就当前指导文件进行公开咨询并由英国化学品法规局(CRD,2010)实施的外包项目后,形成了这种观点。它并非旨在进行详尽的审查,而是以读者所参考的现有文档为基础,并更详细地讨论与评估植物保护产品的皮肤吸收有关的要素。它概述了皮肤和物质的特性以及对吸收有影响的其他决定因素,描述了实验研究设计中的重要元素,并分析了关于PPPs皮肤吸收的可用数据。 PPR专家组的结论是,在没有专门研究的情况下,可以根据专家组从可用数据库的分析得出的默认值进行皮肤吸收评估。描述并评论了分层方法的要素。 PPR小组还得出结论,体外人体研究可以用作评估皮肤吸收的独立测试。专家组指出了一些其他要求,以使现有的OECD测试准则适应PPP及其制定的特殊要求。研究的统一报告也被认为是重要的。已经确定了可以进行进一步研究的一些领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Petersen Annette;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号