首页> 外文OA文献 >EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on on the development of a risk ranking framework on biological hazards
【2h】

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on on the development of a risk ranking framework on biological hazards

机译:EFsa生物危害小组(BIOHaZ);关于制定生物危害风险等级框架的科学意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The risk ranking exercises related to biological hazards undertaken in fourteen risk assessments of the EFSA/BIOHAZ Panel were reviewed. The aim was to suggest risk ranking tools to be used in future risk assessments and to analyse strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to risk ranking. It was concluded that there is no universal methodology for risk ranking. A conceptual risk ranking framework with nine separate stages is proposed to allow the adoption of the appropriate risk ranking methodology at each stage. Further, nine risk ranking tools developed by other institutions worldwide were described, although none of these could be recommended as the single risk ranking tool for the BIOHAZ Panel. It is recommended that the risk ranking exercise should take a structured approach and be transparently and consistently documented so to be reproducible. The importance of the proper correspondence between the time frame and the requirements of the risk ranking exercise was stressed as well as the interaction between the risk managers and the risk assessors in the definition of the risk ranking purpose and the presentation of the results. Furthermore the development of a risk ranking toolbox based on the proposed framework should be investigated, since such a toolbox would support the construction of consistent and transparent risk ranking models.
机译:审查了EFSA / BIOHAZ小组进行的14次风险评估中与生物危害有关的风险排名练习。目的是建议用于未来风险评估的风险排名工具,并分析不同风险排名方法的优缺点。结论是,没有通用的风险排名方法。提出了一个具有9个单独阶段的概念风险分级框架,以允许在每个阶段采用适当的风险分级方法。此外,还描述了世界其他机构开发的九种风险分级工具,尽管这些工具都不能推荐作为BIOHAZ小组的单一风险分级工具。建议风险分级练习应采用结构化方法,并透明且一致地记录下来,以便可重复。强调了时间框架与风险评级活动要求之间适当对应的重要性,以及风险管理者与风险评估者之间在风险评级目的定义和结果表述中的相互作用的重要性。此外,应该研究基于提出的框架的风险等级工具箱的开发,因为这样的工具箱将支持构建一致且透明的风险等级模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hald Tine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号