首页> 外文OA文献 >Mediated transparency: truth, truthfulness, and rightness in digital healthcare discourse
【2h】

Mediated transparency: truth, truthfulness, and rightness in digital healthcare discourse

机译:中介透明度:数字医疗话语中的真实性,真实性和正确性

摘要

This thesis addresses the challenges of producing digitally mediated healthcare information, a high-stakes arena which is conceptualised as a complex discourse and its diverse producers as interlocutors within this discourse. The study is located theoretically in the tradition of universal or formal pragmatics, the foundation of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Building on this theoretical core a conceptual framework is developed that integrates insight from several other traditions, including communication studies. The notion of communicative transparency is aligned with the idealised goal of a rich informational context supporting a range of perspectives in movement towards a balanced and consensual understanding by lay and expert actors of healthcare in our world. The central research question is: Can digital mediation increase the transparency of healthcare communication?udThe empirical focus rests on two organisations involved in the creation of digital information products. Key mediators of meaning in digital healthcare information are identified as the diverse types of expertise of its producers, the materiality of digital artefacts, and the communicative mechanisms, processes and practices that often lead to departures from the normative idealised standard of transparency. The methodology is a comparative case analysis based on field research employing principally interviews to build a rich corpus, analysed using a recursive in-depth thematic coding procedure to reveal the ways in which digitally mediated healthcare meanings are shaped and shared.udThe study demonstrates how communicative transparency emerges from shared frames of reference and common models of communication. It is concluded that digital mediation can indeed increase the transparency of healthcare information by supporting the deepening of Habermasian rational discourse, providing that validity claims to truth, truthfulness, and rightness can be raised and resolved at all stages in the discourse among all interlocutors, whatever their role and status.
机译:本论文解决了产生数字化医疗信息的挑战,这是一个高风险的竞技场,其概念化为复杂的话语,其多样化的产生者则是该话语中的对话者。该研究从理论上讲是普遍或正式语用学的传统,是哈贝马斯交往行为理论的基础。在此理论核心的基础上,开发了一个概念框架,该框架整合了包括传播研究在内的其他几种传统的见解。沟通透明性的概念与理想的目标相吻合,即理想的目标是拥有丰富的信息环境,以支持我们世界各地的非专业人士和专家参与者在寻求平衡和共识的理解过程中的各种观点。中心研究问题是:数字调解能否增加医疗保健沟通的透明度? ud实证重点在于参与数字信息产品创建的两个组织。数字医疗信息中意义的关键中介者被确定为其生产者的各种专业知识,数字人工制品的重要性以及通常导致偏离规范化的理想化透明标准的沟通机制,过程和做法。该方法是一项基于案例研究的比较案例分析,主要是通过访谈来建立一个丰富的语料库,然后使用递归深度主题编码程序进行分析,以揭示塑造和共享数字化医疗保健含义的方式。 ud该研究表明了如何交流的透明性来自共享的参考框架和通用的交流模型。结论是,数字调解确实可以通过支持哈贝马斯理性话语的加深而确实增加医疗保健信息的透明度,前提是可以在所有对话者的话语的各个阶段提出并解决对真理,真实性和正确性的有效性主张,无论如何他们的角色和地位。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blackett Nina Jane;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号