首页> 外文OA文献 >Formal and informal relations between un headquarters, permanent missions and NGOs - A social network analysis.
【2h】

Formal and informal relations between un headquarters, permanent missions and NGOs - A social network analysis.

机译:联合国总部,常驻代表团和非政府组织之间的正式和非正式关系 - 社会网络分析。

摘要

NGOs have long been active at the UN, making the organisation a unique venue for analysing the work of NGOs, and how they cooperate with other NGOs, the UN and its member states. After major UN conferences it appeared as if NGOs had become part of the UN machinery, a perception reinforced by the growing number of accredited NGOs, and the positive language of partnership used by the UN itself to describe its relationship with NGOs.On the basis of a social network analysis, this study shows that individual success stories do not translate into a pervasive influence of NGOs at the international level, and more specifically as analysed here, at the UN. There are no formal arrangements for NGO participation at the most important UN organs, the Security Council and the General Assembly. Attempts in the past to establish such mechanisms failed because of the strong resistance of member states. As for informal cooperation, it remains patchy and undermined by a high degree of mistrust between NGOs and the UN, particularly when it comes to member state representatives. The replacement of major conferences by summits with very limited NGO partiCipation, and the failure of the Cardoso Panel to expand NGO rights, further suggests a backlash in UN-NGO relations. Bearing in mind that global governance calls for a stronger role of NGOs in international affairs, and that UN conferences are often mentioned as key venues for global civil society action, the study warns that concepts of global governance and global civil society should only be used with caution. The author used to work for the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service in New York, advised the Office of the Under-Secretary-General in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs on NGO matters and served as the Assistant Secretary of the Committee on NGOs of the Economic and Social Council.
机译:非政府组织长期以来一直活跃于联合国,使该组织成为分析非政府组织工作以及它们如何与其他非政府组织,联合国及其成员国合作的独特场所。在主要的联合国会议之后,似乎非政府组织已经成为联合国机构的一部分,这种认可因越来越多的认可非政府组织而加强,并且联合国本身使用积极的伙伴关系语言来描述其与非政府组织的关系。一项社会网络分析表明,个人的成功故事并不能转化为非政府组织在国际上的普遍影响,尤其是在联合国进行的分析中。非政府组织没有正式安排参加联合国最重要的机构,安全理事会和大会。由于成员国的强烈抵制,过去建立这种机制的尝试失败了。至于非正式合作,非政府组织与联合国之间的高度不信任,尤其是在成员国代表的信任上,仍然是零散的和破坏的。非政府组织的参与非常有限,首脑会议取代了主要会议,卡多佐事务委员会未能扩大非政府组织的权利,这进一步表明了联合国非政府组织关系的强烈反对。考虑到全球治理要求非政府组织在国际事务中发挥更大作用,而且联合国会议经常被提及为全球民间社会行动的关键场所,该研究警告说,全球治理和全球民间社会的概念只应与警告。撰文人曾在纽约的联合国非政府联络处工作,曾就非政府组织事务向经济及社会事务部副秘书长办公室提供咨询,并担任联合国非政府组织委员会助理秘书。经济及社会理事会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kallmeyer Anja;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号