首页> 外文OA文献 >Financiers vs. Engineers:Should the Financial Sector be Taxed or Subsidized?
【2h】

Financiers vs. Engineers:Should the Financial Sector be Taxed or Subsidized?

机译:金融家与工程师:金融部门应该纳税还是补贴?

摘要

I study the allocation of human capital in an economy with production externalities, financial constraints and career choices. Agents choose to become entrepreneurs, workers or financiers. Entrepreneurship has positive externalities, but innovators face borrowing constraints and require the services of financiers in order to invest efficiently. When investment and education subsidies are chosen optimally, I find that the financial sector should be taxed in exactly the same way as the non-financial sector. When direct subsidies to investment and scientific education are not feasible, giving a preferred tax treatment to the financial sector can improve welfare by increasing aggregate investment in research and development.
机译:我研究具有生产外部性,财务约束和职业选择的经济体中的人力资本分配。代理商选择成为企业家,工人或金融家。企业家精神具有积极的外部性,但创新者面临借款限制,需要融资者的服务才能有效投资。当最优地选择投资和教育补贴时,我发现金融部门应与非金融部门完全一样地征税。如果对投资和科学教育的直接补贴不可行,则对金融部门给予优惠税收待遇可以通过增加对研发的总投资来改善福利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Philippon Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号