首页> 外文期刊>American economic journal >Financiers versus Engineers:Should the Financial Sector be Taxed or Subsidized?
【24h】

Financiers versus Engineers:Should the Financial Sector be Taxed or Subsidized?

机译:金融家与工程师:金融业应该征税还是补贴?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I study the allocation of human capital in an economy with production externalities, financial constraints, and career choices. Agents choose to become entrepreneurs, workers, or financiers. Entrepreneurship has positive externalities but requires the services of financiers. In the second best solution, the financial sector should be taxed in exactly the same way as the nonfinancial sector. When direct subsidies to investment and scientific education are not feasible, subsidizing the financial sector increases growth if externalities are driven by physical capital as in Paul M. Romer(1986), and decreases growth if externalities are driven by human capital as in Robert E. Lucas, Jr.(1988).
机译:我研究具有生产外部性,财务约束和职业选择的经济体中的人力资本配置。代理商选择成为企业家,工人或金融家。企业家精神具有积极的外部性,但需要融资者的服务。在第二个最佳解决方案中,应该以与非金融部门完全相同的方式对金融部门征税。当对投资和科学教育的直接补贴不可行时,如Paul M. Romer(1986)所述,如果外部性是由有形资本驱动的,则对金融部门的补贴将增加增长,而如Robert E.则由人力资本驱动,则对金融部门的补贴将减少增长。小卢卡斯(1988)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American economic journal》 |2010年第3期|P.158-182|共25页
  • 作者

    Thomas Philippon;

  • 作者单位

    New York University, Stern School of Business, National Bureau of Economic Research, and Center for Economic and Policy Research;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号