首页> 外文OA文献 >Trademark counterfeiting : comparative legal analysis on enforcement within Malaysia and the United Kingdom and at their borders
【2h】

Trademark counterfeiting : comparative legal analysis on enforcement within Malaysia and the United Kingdom and at their borders

机译:商标假冒:马来西亚和英国境内及其边境执法的比较法律分析

摘要

Trademarks play an important role in conveying reliable information to consumers about the quality of goods and the manufacturer’s reputation. Counterfeiting can destroy these important benefits. Despite difficulty in quantifying its scope and effects, many studies recognise the global prevalence of counterfeiting. Its invasion across product categories harms legitimate producers, economies and society. While there are many contributing factors to its proliferation, the only real area where a government can make a difference is in setting up a responsive legal system that includes good enforcement against counterfeiting. This study aims to address that need by examining comparatively how the relevant intellectual property laws can be used as effective enforcement mechanisms in Malaysia and the UK. The importance and, effectiveness of and key obstacles in judicial proceedings and border measures in both countries are examined and analyzed, using a combination of comparative, doctrinal and socio-legal research. The data used derives from relevant legislation, case law, legal literature and public domain statistics. These sources are supplemented and corroborated by interviews with key figures (official, judicial, practitioner) in Malaysia and Europe. This study draws the following conclusions: (1) Civil proceedings in both countries are comprehensive but the responsible authorities need to review litigation costs to ensure the effectiveness of civil remedies. Malaysia should explicitly provide for remedies in its Trade Marks Act 1976. (2) In criminal actions, forfeiture of assets obtained through counterfeiting activities could be the most effective form of punishment and deterrence, coupled with the use of officers experienced in handling prosecutions. (3) Compared to judicial proceedings, border measures could be the most effective mechanisms in preventing the proliferation of counterfeit goods, but close co-operation and effective communication between rights-holders and customs authorities are crucial in this regard.
机译:商标在向消费者传达有关商品质量和制造商声誉的可靠信息方面起着重要作用。伪造品可能会破坏这些重要利益。尽管难以量化其范围和影响,但许多研究仍认识到假冒在全球范围内的盛行。其跨产品类别的入侵会损害合法的生产者,经济和社会。尽管有许多促成其扩散的因素,但政府能够做出改变的唯一实际领域是建立响应迅速的法律体系,其中包括对假冒产品的良好执法。这项研究旨在通过比较研究如何将相关知识产权法律用作马来西亚和英国的有效执法机制来满足这一需求。结合比较,理论和社会法律研究,对两国司法程序和边境措施的重要性,有效性和主要障碍进行了分析。所使用的数据来自相关立法,判例法,法律文献和公共领域统计数据。通过与马来西亚和欧洲的关键人物(官方,司法,从业人员)访谈,这些资料得到补充和证实。这项研究得出以下结论:(1)两国的民事诉讼程序都很全面,但主管当局需要审查诉讼费用以确保民事补救措施的有效性。马来西亚应在其1976年《商标法》中明确规定补救措施。(2)在刑事诉讼中,没收通过假冒活动获得的资产可能是最有效的惩罚和威慑形式,同时还需要使用在起诉方面经验丰富的人员。 (3)与司法程序相比,边境措施可能是防止假冒产品扩散的最有效机制,但是在这方面,权利人与海关当局之间的密切合作和有效沟通至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mohamed Khadijah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号