首页> 外文OA文献 >The effects of individual differences and instructional aids on learners' disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in a hypermedia learning system
【2h】

The effects of individual differences and instructional aids on learners' disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in a hypermedia learning system

机译:个体差异和教学辅助对超媒体学习系统中学习者的迷失方向,学习表现和态度的影响

摘要

Hypermedia Learning Systems (HLS) are being used increasingly widely in Higher Education, offering non-linear navigation through complex learning materials and, it is argued, leading to improve cognitive flexibility. For some learners, though, nonlinear navigation in HLS leads to higher levels of disorientation, which can have an impact on their learning performance and attitudes towards the learning system. There has been significant research into the factors that can influence individual learners‘ experiences. For example, a number of studies have confirmed that individual differences such as cognitive style, domain knowledge and computer experience affect individuals‘ levels of disorientation and learning performance, and influence their attitudes towards HLS. It has also been suggested that instructional aids (in the form of certain visual elements and audio elements) can reduce levels of disorientation and, in turn, increase learning performance in, and positive attitudes towards, HLS for some learners. However, existing studies have tended to look at only a subset of these three individual differences in relation to an individual and/or consider only a small number of visual instructional aids. No study up to this point has considered the impact of cognitive style, domain knowledge and computer experience on disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in a HLS that incorporates a full range of visual instructional aids. In terms of the research related to audio instructional aids, no studies have looked into the effects of audio aids and these three individual differences in relation to disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in HLS. This thesis addresses these two shortcomings through two experiments. The aim of experiment 1 was to examine the effects of and between these three individual differences with respect to disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in two versions of a HLS: one that incorporated the set of visual instructional aids and one that did not. Experiment 2 aimed to do the same, but with respect to a HLS that provided audio instructional aids. The experiments used quantitative and qualitative approaches to gather data to address a set of research questions and research hypotheses. The participants were 384 university students from across London. The Cognitive Style Analysis (CSA) test was administered to determine participants‘ field dependence, and participants‘ demographic information, levels of computer experience and levels of prior knowledge were gathered using questionnaires. Learning performance was measured through achievement tests and a practical task. Levels of disorientation were measured using questionnaires, and attitudes were assessed using questionnaires and interviews. Participants were also observed when they were interacting with the HLS to perform learning tasks. A number of interesting results were revealed. Significant effects were found between the three individual differences with respect to disorientation, learning performance and attitudes in the HLS that provided no instructional aids. No significant effects were found between the three individual differences with respect to disorientation or learning performance in the other two versions of the HLS – those providing visual and audio instructional aids. Significant effects were found between the three individual differences with respect to the use of the visual and audio instructional aids to perform learning in the HLS. No significant effects were found between the three individual differences with respect to attitudes in the HLS that provided visual instructional aids. Significant effects were found between the three individual differences with respect to attitudes in the version that provided audio instructional aids. Analysis of the results led to the framing of a set of HLS design guidelines which are presented in this thesis. Finally, an agenda for future research leading on from the study‘s findings is presented.
机译:超媒体学习系统(HLS)在高等教育中得到越来越广泛的使用,它通过复杂的学习材料提供非线性导航,并且据称可以提高认知的灵活性。但是,对于某些学习者而言,HLS中的非线性导航会导致更高的迷失方向,这可能会影响他们的学习成绩和对学习系统的态度。对影响个人学习者体验的因素进行了大量研究。例如,许多研究已经证实,诸如认知风格,领域知识和计算机体验之类的个体差异会影响个体的迷失方向和学习成绩,并影响他们对HLS的态度。还已经提出,教学辅助工具(以某些视觉元素和音频元素的形式)可以减少迷失方向的程度,进而可以提高某些学习者对HLS的学习表现和对LLS的积极态度。然而,现有的研究倾向于只关注与个人相关的这三个个体差异的一个子集和/或仅考虑少量的视觉教学辅助手段。到目前为止,还没有研究考虑过认知风格,领域知识和计算机体验对HLS的迷惑,学习成绩和态度的影响,而HLS包含了全方位的视觉教学帮助。在有关音频教学辅助工具的研究方面,还没有研究关注音频辅助工具的效果以及这三个与HLS中的迷失方向,学习成绩和态度有关的个体差异。本文通过两个实验解决了这两个缺点。实验1的目的是研究两种版本的HLS中关于迷失方向,学习成绩和态度的这三种个体差异的影响,以及这三种差异之间的影响:一种包含视觉教学辅助工具,而另一种则没有。实验2的目的是这样做,只是针对提供语音教学帮助的HLS。实验使用定量和定性方法来收集数据,以解决一组研究问题和研究假设。参与者是来自伦敦各地的384名大学生。进行了认知风格分析(CSA)测试,以确定参与者的场依存性,并使用调查表收集参与者的人口统计学信息,计算机体验水平和先验知识水平。学习成绩通过成就测试和一项实际任务来衡量。使用问卷调查来衡量迷失方向的水平,并使用问卷调查和访谈来评估态度。当参与者与HLS互动以执行学习任务时,他们也被观察到。揭示了许多有趣的结果。在没有提供教学帮助的HLS中,在迷失方向,学习成绩和态度方面,发现了三个个体差异之间的显着影响。在HLS的其他两个版本中,这三个提供视觉和听觉教学帮助的个体在迷失方向或学习性能方面,没有发现任何明显的影响。在视觉和听觉教学辅助工具的使用方面,在HLS中发现了三个个体差异之间的显着效果。在提供视觉教学帮助的HLS中,在态度上的三个个体差异之间没有发现显着影响。在提供语音教学帮助的版本中,在态度上的三个个体差异之间发现了显着效果。对结果的分析导致了本论文介绍的一套HLS设计指南的框架。最后,提出了以研究结果为基础的未来研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号