首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of freedom of expression and right to privacy in relation to the press in Malaysia and the United Kingdom
【2h】

A comparative study of freedom of expression and right to privacy in relation to the press in Malaysia and the United Kingdom

机译:与马来西亚和英国媒体有关的言论自由和隐私权的比较研究

摘要

The purpose of this study is to examine the protection of privacy in Malaysia against invasion by the press. The study argues that there ought to be a form of legal protection against invasion of privacy by the press. Protection of privacy should be viewed as complementary to a system protecting the exercise of free expression rather than opposing to such a system. The study establishes that the existence of institutional design within the constitutional framework creates a regimented restriction on freedom of expression vis-ä-vis freedom of the press. The orientation of the restrictions, which is based on expediency and necessity, gives prominence to relativism. Arguably, this would thwart potential development and the course of human rights in Malaysia. The study also examines the protection of privacy and freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. The development of privacy in the United Kingdom, which is moving towards accepting privacy as a right, could be used as a model in developing the law in Malaysia. Legal development on privacy is arguably tenable in Malaysia considering the fact that privacy-related interests are being protected under the common law principles as such in the United Kingdom. The study argues that the law should be in accordance with the local particularities on a contextual basis as against the transplantation of foreign principles. The study also argues that the approach of reflective equilibrium, whereby both universalism and relativism are taken into account, is appropriate in case of Malaysia considering the indigenous socio-political milieu. The study concludes that in the absence of legislative commitment, privacy could be better protected under institutional mechanism by way of co-regulation under the province of Media Council or the Human Rights Commission. In view of this matter, the study will scrutinise the effectiveness of the institutions in providing protection to privacy.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究保护马来西亚的隐私权免受新闻界入侵。该研究认为,应该有一种法律形式的保护,以防止新闻界侵犯隐私。应该将保护隐私视为保护行使自由表达的制度的补充,而不是与这种制度相对立。研究发现,宪法框架内制度设计的存在对言论自由和新闻自由形成了有条理的限制。限制的方向基于权宜之计和必要性,使相对主义突出。可以说,这将阻碍马来西亚的潜在发展和人权进程。该研究还考察了英国对隐私和言论自由的保护。英国正在朝着接受隐私作为一种权利的方向发展隐私,可以作为马来西亚制定法律的典范。考虑到隐私相关的利益受到英国等普通法原则的保护这一事实,在隐私方面的法律发展在马来西亚是可以成立的。该研究认为,法律应在上下文的基础上符合当地的特殊性,而不是移植外国原则。该研究还认为,在马来西亚考虑土著社会政治环境的情况下,反射均衡的方法是适当的,该方法考虑了普遍主义和相对主义。研究得出的结论是,在没有立法承诺的情况下,可以通过媒体理事会省或人权委员会的共同监管,在体制机制下更好地保护隐私。鉴于此,本研究将仔细研究机构在保护隐私方面的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dziyauddin Haidar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号