首页> 外文OA文献 >Pensions at a glance: public policies across OECD countries
【2h】

Pensions at a glance: public policies across OECD countries

机译:养老金一览:经合组织国家的公共政策

摘要

This second edition of Pensions at a Glance updates all the important indicators of retirement-income systems developed for the first edition. The values of all pension system parameters reflect the situation in the year 2004. The general approach adopted is a “microeconomic” one, looking at prospective individual entitlements under all 30 of OECD member countries’ pension regimes. The report starts by showing the different schemes that together make up national retirement income provision, including a summary of the parameters and rules of pension systems. This is followed by eight main indicators of pension income that are calculated using the OECD pension models. This issue also contains two special analyses on pension reforms and private pensions, which use the OECD pension models to explore more deeply the central issues of pension policy in national debates. Finally, the report provides detailed background information on each of the 30 countries’ retirement-income arrangements. For workers at average earnings, the average for the OECD countries of the gross replacement rate, i.e. the ratio between pension benefit and pre-retirement earnings, from mandatory pensions is 58.7%. But taxes play an important role in old-age support. Pensioners often do not pay social security contributions and, as personal income taxes are progressive and pension entitlements are usually lower than earnings before retirement, they usually pay less taxes. For average earners, the net replacement rate across OECD countries is nearly 70% on average, some 11 percentage points higher than the average gross replacement rate. For low earners, the average net replacement rate across OECD countries is 83%. But there are regional differences: the Nordic countries offer a 95% net replacement rate to workers on half average earnings while the Anglophone OECD countries pay 76% of previous net earnings.What matters for governments, however, is not only the replacement rate but the value of the overall pension promise. This is measured by the indicator of pension wealth which takes life expectancy and the indexation of pensions in payment into account. Using this indicator, the pension promise is most expensive in Luxembourg. On average, each male pensioner will receive the equivalent of USD 920 000 and each female retiree over USD 1 million. The Netherlands and Greece rank second and third on this measure. The most modest pension systems are those of Belgium, Ireland, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States where pension wealth is around two-thirds of the average for OECD countries. The lowest ranking is occupied by Mexico where men and women are promised a pension equivalent to USD 34 000 and 32 000, respectively.Nearly all the 30 OECD countries have made at least some changes to their pension systems since 1990. As a result, the average pension promise in the 16 countries - whose reforms are studied in this report - was cut by 22%. For women, the reduction was 25%. Only in two of the 16 countries – Hungary and the United Kingdom – were there increased pension promises on average.How will these changes affect different individuals? Some countries – such as France, Portugal and the United Kingdom – are moving towards greater targeting of public pensions on low earners thus bolstering the safety-net. Others – such as Poland and the Slovak Republic – have moved to tighten the link between pension entitlements and earnings, which may put low-earners at a higher risk of poverty. In Germany, Japan, Mexico, Poland and the Slovak Republic, for example, the net pension entitlement for a full-career worker with half average earnings was around 41% of average earnings before reform, slightly below the average for the OECD as a whole. The reforms will cut this to just 32.5%. In contrast, Finland, France, Hungary, Korea, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have protected low-income workers from cuts in benefit in their pension reforms.The intense reform activity in OECD countries means that today’s workers will have to do more on their own to prepare for tomorrow’s retirement. In some countries, the savings effort necessary to reach the OECD average replacement rate is substantial, even if workers save throughout their entire career. If young workers miss out on the first 10 or 15 years of their career because of other demands on their budget, reaching a sufficient pension level will become even more difficult. This report illustrates how important it is that workers start saving early and contribute regularly.
机译:第二版《退休金概览》更新了为第一版开发的退休收入系统的所有重要指标。所有养老金系统参数的值都反映了2004年的情况。采用的一般方法是“微观经济学”方法,着眼于OECD所有30个成员国的养老金制度下的预期个人应享权利。该报告首先显示了构成国家退休收入准备金的不同计划,包括养老金制度的参数和规则的摘要。其次是使用OECD养老金模型计算的八个主要养老金收入指标。本期还包含有关养老金改革和私人养老金的两个特殊分析,它们使用经合组织的养老金模型来更深入地探讨国家辩论中养老金政策的核心问题。最后,该报告提供了有关30个国家/地区的退休收入安排的详细背景信息。对于平均收入的工人,经合发组织国家的平均总重置率,即强制性养老金的退休金和退休前收入之间的比率为58.7%。但是税收在养老方面起着重要的作用。养老金领取者通常不缴纳社会保障缴款,而且由于个人所得税是累进的,养老金应享权利通常低于退休前的收入,因此他们通常缴纳的税款较少。对于平均收入者,经合组织国家的净替代率平均接近70%,比平均总替代率高约11个百分点。对于低收入者,经合组织国家的平均净替代率为83%。但是存在地区差异:北欧国家为工人提供平均净收入一半的净替代率95%,而英语经合组织国家为以前的净收入提供76%的替代率。总体养老金承诺的价值。这由养老金财富指标衡量,该指标考虑了预期寿命和支付中的养老金指数。使用该指标,养老金承诺在卢森堡最昂贵。平均而言,每位男性养老金领取者将获得等值的92万美元,每位女性退休人员将获得100万美元以上。荷兰和希腊在这项措施上分别位居第二和第三。最适度的养老金制度是比利时,爱尔兰,日本,英国和美国,这些国家的养老金财富约为经合组织国家平均水平的三分之二。排名最低的是墨西哥,向男性和女性分别承诺分别相当于34,000美元和32,000美元的养老金。自1990年以来,几乎所有30个经合组织国家都对其养老金制度进行了至少一些改变。 16个国家的平均养老金承诺(本报告中已对其改革进行了研究)降低了22%。对于女性,减少了25%。 16个国家中只有两个国家(匈牙利和英国)平均提高了养老金承诺。这些变化将如何影响不同的个人?一些国家,例如法国,葡萄牙和英国,正朝着将公共养老金面向低收入者的目标迈进,从而加强了安全网。其他国家,例如波兰和斯洛伐克共和国,已采取措施加强养老金待遇和收入之间的联系,这可能会使低收入者面临更高的贫困风险。例如,在德国,日本,墨西哥,波兰和斯洛伐克共和国,平均收入一半的正式职业工人的退休金净额约为改革前平均收入的41%,略低于经合组织整体的平均水平。改革将这一比例降至32.5%。相比之下,芬兰,法国,匈牙利,韩国,新西兰和英国在养老金改革中保护了低收入工人免于削减利益。经合组织国家的激烈改革活动意味着今天的工人将不得不在自己的工作上做更多的事情自己为明天的退休做准备。在某些国家,即使工人在整个职业生涯中都进行储蓄,为达到经合组织平均替代率所必需的储蓄努力也是巨大的。如果青年工人由于预算方面的其他要求而错过了职业生涯的前10年或15年,那么达到足够的养老金水平将变得更加困难。该报告说明了工人早日开始储蓄并定期缴款的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号