This legal writing is entitled “The Role of Commission of Judiciaryudtowords the attonery’s Performance as General Prosecutor in Corruption CriminaludAction”. The problem formulation was: what is the barrier to the commission ofudattorney in supervising the attorney’s performance as general prosecutor inudcorruption criminal action? The purpose of this research was to comprenhend andudfinding out any data concerning on the barriers of Commission of Judiciary inudsupervising the attorney’s review were: 1) The meaning of the role of commissionudof judiciary, 2) Supervising and monitoring the general prosecutor’s performance.udThe type of this research was normative reseach. The data of this reseach gainedudfrom primary and secondary legal sources. The method of data collection wasudconducted by literary reseach and direct interview to the source person. The dataudanalysis was qualitatively conducted through 4 step, i.e.: description of positiveudlaw, systematization of positive law, interpretation of positive law, and analysis ofudsecondary legal source. The location of this researrch was in the office ofudCommission of Judiciary located on Jalan Rambai no. 1 A Kebayoran, SouthudJakarta. The source person was Puspo Aji as the Vice of Commission of Judiciary.udIndonesia state is a legal state, thus the legal enforcement and justice are absoluteudconditions. However in fact, the legal apparatus conduct legal violation. One ofudthem is the attorney as the legal enforcement who has authority to conductudprosecution; the attorneys misue their authority due of their private necessities andudneglect the general necessities. Thus the president founded a commission namedudCommission of Judiciary who has duty to supervise the attorney’s performanceudinside or outside the departement. However the commission of judiciary has notudbeen optimal caused at least the report of internal supervision, the happenings ofudcollusion in internal supervision.
展开▼
