The aim of this work is to examine a few aspects of Jacques Derrida’s reading of the philosophy of Heidegger and Levinas. Specifically, we intend to show that the criticism Derrida directs towards certain themes in Levinas’s thought at the same time contains a revaluation of Heidegger’s ontology as it was developed during the 1920s, before the so-called Kehre. What this triple hermeneutic comparison puts into play is the relationship between ethics and ontology. In critiquing the relationship between these two concepts in Levinas, Derrida seems to move closer to the way they are described and developed in both Being and Time and in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Finally, we will try to show how this reevaluation of ontology by Derrida determines his approach to the philosophy of Jean-Luc Nancy, whose ethics, differently from Levinas’s, is an ethics of ontology.
展开▼
机译：这项工作的目的是考察雅克·德里达（Jacques Derrida）对海德格尔和列维纳斯（Hevindger and Levinas）哲学的理解的几个方面。具体来说，我们打算表明，德里达的批评指向了列维纳斯思想中的某些主题，同时包含了对海德格尔本体论的重新评估，该本体论是在1920年代（即所谓的凯勒）出现之前发展起来的。这种三重解释学比较发挥的作用是伦理学与本体论之间的关系。在批判列维纳斯这两个概念之间的关系时，德里达似乎更接近在《存在与时间》以及《康德和形而上学问题》中对它们的描述和发展的方式。最后，我们将尝试展示德里达对本体的重新评估如何决定他对让·卢克·南希（Jean-Luc Nancy）哲学的态度，他的伦理学与列维纳斯（Levinas）的伦理学不同。
展开▼
