首页> 外文OA文献 >Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide selection of chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer management: a systematic review
【2h】

Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide selection of chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer management: a systematic review

机译:基因表达谱和扩展的免疫组织化学测试指导乳腺癌管理中化疗方案的选择:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this report was to assess the clinical effectiveness of twoudGene expression profiling (GEP) and two expanded immunohistochemistry (IHC)udtests compared with current prognostic tools in guiding the use of adjuvantudchemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.ududMETHODS: A systematic review of the evidence on clinical effectiveness ofudOncotypeDX, IHC4, MammaPrint and Mammostrat, compared with current clinicaludpractice using clinicopathological parameters, in women with early breast cancerudwas conducted. Ten databases were searched to include citations to May 2016.ududRESULTS: Searches identified 7064 citations, of which 41 citations satisfied theudcriteria for the review. A narrative synthesis was performed. Evidence forudOncotypeDX demonstrated the impact of the test on decision-making and there wasudsome support for OncotypeDX predicting chemotherapy benefit. There wereudrelatively lower levels of evidence for the other three tests included in the analysis.udMammaPrint, Mammostrat and IHC4 tests were limited to a small number of studies.udLimitations in relation to study design were identified for all tests.ududCONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for OncotypeDX is considered to be the mostudrobust. Methodological weaknesses relating to heterogeneity of patient cohorts andudissues arising from the retrospective nature of the evidence were identified. Furtherudevidence is required for all of the tests using prospective randomised controlled trialuddata.ud
机译:目的:本报告旨在评估两种 udGene表达谱(GEP)和两种扩展免疫组织化学(IHC) udtest的临床有效性,并与目前的预后工具相比较,以指导早期乳腺癌患者使用辅助 udchemotherapy方法:系统评价了早期乳腺癌女性患者中udOncotypeDX,IHC4,MammaPrint和Mammostrat的临床有效性,并与目前使用临床病理参数的临床实践进行了比较。搜索了十个数据库,以包括截至2016年5月的引文。 ud ud结果:搜索确定7064篇引文,其中41篇引文满足该评论的标准。进行叙述性合成。 udOncotypeDX的证据证明了该测试对决策的影响,并且 oncotypeDX预测化疗获益具有一定程度的支持。 udmammaPrint,Mammostrat和IHC4测试仅限于少数几个研究。 ud对于所有测试都确定了与研究设计相关的限制。 ud 结论:OncotypeDX的证据基础被认为是最最不可靠的。鉴定了由于证据的回顾性而引起的与患者队列和组织异质性相关的方法学缺陷。使用前瞻性随机对照试验 uddata,所有测试均需要进一步的证据。 ud

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号