首页> 外文OA文献 >Introduction: New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation
【2h】

Introduction: New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation

机译:简介:新民主主义空间?制度化参与的政治与动力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Across the world, as new democratic experiments meet withand transformolder forms of governance, political space for public engagement in governance appears to be widening. A renewed concern with rights, power and difference in debates about participation in development has focused greater attention on the institutions at the interface between publics, providers and policy makers. Some see in them exciting prospects for the practice of more vibrant and deliberative democracy (Fung and Wright 2003; Gaventa, forthcoming).Others raise concerns about them as forms of co-option, and as absorbing, neutralising and deflecting social energy from other forms of political participation (Taylor 1998). The title of this Bulletin reflects some of their ambiguities as arenas that may be neither new nor democratic, but at the same time appear to hold promise for renewing and deepening democracy. Through a series of case studies from a range of political and cultural contexts – Brazil, India,Bangladesh,Mexico, South Africa, England and the United States of America, contributors to this Bulletinexplore the interfaces between different forms of public engagement. Their studies engage with questions about representation, inclusion and voice, about the political efficacy of citizen engagement as well as the viability of these new arenas as political institutions. Read together, they serve to emphasise the historical, cultural and political embeddedness of the institutions and actors that constitute spaces for participation.
机译:在全球范围内,随着新的民主试验与治理的变革形式相遇,公众参与治理的政治空间似乎正在扩大。对权利,权力和关于参与发展的辩论中的分歧再次引起关注,使人们更加关注公众,提供者和决策者之间相互作用的机构。有些人认为他们有朝气蓬勃,更深思熟虑的民主实践的前景(Fung and Wright 2003; Gaventa,即将出版);另一些人则担心它们是一种选择方式,以及吸收,中和和转移其他形式的社会能量。政治参与(Taylor 1998)。该公报的标题反映了它们在某些领域的含糊之处,这些领域可能既不是新的也不是民主的,但同时似乎有望更新和深化民主。通过从一系列政治和文化背景下进行的一系列案例研究–巴西,印度,孟加拉国,墨西哥,南非,英格兰和美利坚合众国,本公报的撰稿人探索了不同形式的公众参与之间的关系。他们的研究涉及有关代表性,包容性和发言权,公民参与的政治效力以及这些新领域作为政治机构的可行性的问题。一起阅读,它们有助于强调构成参与空间的机构和参与者的历史,文化和政治内在性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cornwall Andrea;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号