首页> 外文OA文献 >Global liquidity glut or global savings glut? A structural VAR approach
【2h】

Global liquidity glut or global savings glut? A structural VAR approach

机译:全球流动性过剩或全球储蓄过剩?结构VaR方法

摘要

Since the late-1990s, the global economy is characterised by historically low risk premia and an unprecedented widening of external imbalances. This paper explores to what extent these two global trends can be understood as a reaction to three structural shocks in different regions of the global economy: (i) monetary shocks (u201cexcess liquidityu201d hypothesis), (ii) preference shocks (u201csavings glutu201d hypothesis), and (iii) investment shocks (u201cinvestment droughtu201d hypothesis). In order to uniquely identify these shocks in an integrated framework, we estimate structural VARs for the two main regions with widening imbalances, the United States and emerging Asia, using sign restrictions that are compatible with standard New Keynesian and Real Business Cycle models. Our results show that monetary shocks potentially explain the largest part of the variation in imbalances and financial market prices. We find that savings shocks and investment shocks explain less of the variation. Hence, a u201cliquidity glutu201d may have been a more important driver of real and financial imbalances in the US and emerging Asia than a u201csavings glutu201d.
机译:自1990年代后期以来,全球经济一直以历史性的低风险溢价和前所未有的外部失衡扩大为特征。本文探讨了这两种全球趋势在多大程度上可以理解为对全球经济不同地区的三种结构性冲击的反应:(i)货币冲击(流动性假设),(ii)偏好冲击(储蓄) (iii)投资冲击(投资干旱假设)。为了在一个集成的框架中唯一地识别这些冲击,我们使用与标准新凯恩斯模型和实际商业周期模型兼容的符号限制来估计两个失衡加剧的主要地区(美国和新兴亚洲)的结构化VAR。我们的结果表明,货币冲击可能解释了失衡和金融市场价格变化的最大部分。我们发现储蓄冲击和投资冲击对这种变化的解释较少。因此,流动性过剩可能是美国和新兴亚洲地区实际和金融失衡的更重要推动因素,而不是储蓄过剩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号