首页> 外文OA文献 >Tax and spend, spend and tax, fiscal synchronisation or institutional separation? Examining the case of Greece
【2h】

Tax and spend, spend and tax, fiscal synchronisation or institutional separation? Examining the case of Greece

机译:税收和支出,支出和税收,财政同步或机构分离?审查希腊的情况

摘要

One of the most controversial issues in public finance and macroeconomics is the nature of the relationship between government spending and revenues. The debate between economists and politicians has been emphasised recently because of the increased budget deficits and defaults in many developed and developing countries. Many economists (Friedman, 1978; Payne, 1997; Darrat, 1998; Albatel, 2002) argued that it is very important to investigate whether the government spending determines the revenues and/or whether government revenue determines the government spending. We are applying an empirical analysis of the spend-tax or tax-spend hypothesis, in order to identify the direction of the causality between government spending and revenues in Greece for the period 1833-2009, a period of industrialisation, urbanisation, increased growth, increased government spending, and enormous budget deficits during the last decades and a serious problem with the public debt. In order to investigate the relationship between government revenues and spending we used the Dickey and Fuller (1979) and Phillips and Perron (1988) unit root tests, the Chow (1960) test and Zivot and Andrews (1992) unit root tests which allow structural changes, the Johansen (1988) cointegration approach and finally the Granger (1969) causality tests. We found strong evidence of long-run relationship between government spending and revenues. Additionally, we used the Granger-causality test which indicates that the causality runs from spending to revenues, thus support of the spend-tax hypothesis. The spend-tax hypothesis maintains that a political system somehow determines how much to spend and then makes the adjustments in tax policy and revenue sources in order to finance the government spending so limitations in spending will be effective for the economy of Greece, but no one could argue that limitations of taxation will be ineffective. It is very important for Greek government to identify the causal direction between government spending and tax revenues, because the direction of causality provides useful insights into how the country can manage their unsustainable budget deficits in the future.
机译:公共财政和宏观经济学中最具争议的问题之一是政府支出与收入之间关系的性质。由于许多发达国家和发展中国家的预算赤字和违约率增加,最近强调了经济学家和政界人士之间的辩论。许多经济学家(弗里德曼,1978年;佩恩,1997年;达拉特,1998年;阿尔巴特尔,2002年)认为,调查政府支出是否决定收入和/或政府收入决定政府支出非常重要。我们正在对支出税或税收支出假说进行实证分析,以便确定1833年至2009年希腊政府支出与收入之间因果关系的方向,工业化,城市化,增长,在过去的几十年中,政府支出增加,预算赤字巨大,公共债务问题严重。为了研究政府收入与支出之间的关系,我们使用了Dickey和Fuller(1979)以及Phillips和Perron(1988)的单位根检验,Chow(1960)的检验以及Zivot和Andrews(1992)的单位根检验。变化,Johansen(1988)的协整方法,最后是Granger(1969)的因果关系检验。我们发现政府支出与收入之间存在长期关系的有力证据。此外,我们使用了格兰杰因果关系检验,该因果关系因果关系由支出到收入,因此支持了消费税假设。支出税假说坚持认为,一种政治制度以某种方式决定支出多少,然后对税收政策和收入来源进行调整,以便为政府支出提供资金,因此支出方面的限制将对希腊经济有效,但没有人可能会认为税收限制将是无效的。对于希腊政府而言,确定政府支出与税收之间的因果关系非常重要,因为因果关系的方向可为该国未来如何管理其不可持续的预算赤字提供有用的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号