首页> 外文OA文献 >The A levels' resit policy and its effect on student learning in three educational institutions in England: an investigation into the practice of students resitting examinations in A levels in three educational institutions in England with a view to exploring the implications of the A levels' resit policy for student learning in sixth-form education
【2h】

The A levels' resit policy and its effect on student learning in three educational institutions in England: an investigation into the practice of students resitting examinations in A levels in three educational institutions in England with a view to exploring the implications of the A levels' resit policy for student learning in sixth-form education

机译:a级调整政策及其对英国三所教育机构学生学习的影响:对英国三所教育机构a级考试重考的实践调查,旨在探讨a级教育的影响第六种形式教育中学生学习的政策

摘要

This thesis is a qualitative study of the implications of the resit policy of A levels for student learning in sixth-form education in England. In contrast to many other high-stakes examinations which test students only at the end of a course, A levels use a modular format where students are allowed to resit past units within the two-year sixth-form course with no limit or penalty. Since resits were introduced extensively to A levels ten years ago, the A-level results have been improving steadily. Every year, without fail, there are reports of another 'best-ever' A levels. Yet, instead of national elation, there is mistrust, suspicion and doubt about rising standards amid allegations of grade inflation; resits are seen as the key reason for the big increases in A-level results.ududThe research adopts an interpretivistic approach, based on the accounts of students and academic staff from three sixth-form educational institutions and university admissions tutors at two universities in England. It explores the practice of resits in sixth-form education, including how students make resit decisions, how they improve in the resit, how resits affect student learning, what impact resits have on the certification and selection roles of A levels, and how students of differing learner identity approach the resit challenge. It contends that, due to a lack of appreciation of the rationale behind the resit policy, no control of resits and the highly competitive nature of selection by universities, the A levels' resit policy has resulted in some educationally undesirable practices in sixth-form education. Only those who adopt a positive approach to resits, have help from their teachers and work hard to improve their learning and skills gain from the system and these conditions are differentially available to students. For the others, the resit system has resulted in an over-emphasis on A levels in sixth-form education, which involves taking examinations early through rushed teaching, elaborate resit strategies, dubious revision tactics and reliance on second chances. All these contribute to warping students' understanding of what counts as valid knowledge or what it means to learn. The resit system has accentuated the examination-oriented culture in sixth-form education and has resulted in an increased focus on extrinsic rewards, performance goals and a surface approach to learning, which may ill-equip students for success at university or for life-long learning.ududThe research aims to demonstrate how a well-intentioned policy for a high-stakes examination can have unintended consequences when it comes to actual practice in the classroom. It concludes that in developing educational and assessment policies, due consideration needs to be given to their implications for student learning and their impact on education as a whole.
机译:本文对英国中学六年级教育中A水平的升学政策对学生学习的意义进行了定性研究。与仅在课程结束时才对学生进行测试的许多其他高风险考试形成鲜明对比的是,A级考试采用模块化格式,允许学生在两年制六年级课程中重修过去的课程,没有任何限制或罚款。自从10年前将住所广泛引入A级后,A级成绩一直在稳步提高。每年,都会有关于“最高” A级水平的报道。然而,在等级通货膨胀的指控中,人们对标准的提高没有信任,怀疑和怀疑,而不是民族兴高采烈。住所被认为是A级成绩大幅提高的主要原因。 ud ud本研究采用解释性方法,该方法基于来自三所第六级教育机构的学生和学术人员以及两所大学的大学招生导师的账目在英国。它探讨了中级教育中的抵制实践,包括学生如何做出抵制决定,如何在抵制中改善,抵制如何影响学生的学习,抵用对A级认证和选拔角色有何影响,以及如何应对不同的学习者身份将应对住所挑战。它认为,由于对升学政策背后的原理缺乏理解,对升学没有控制和大学选择的高度竞争性,A Level的升学政策导致了中学形式教育中一些教育上不良的做法。 。只有那些采用积极方法进行住宿的人,得到老师帮助,并努力提高自己的学习能力和从系统中获得技能的人,这些条件对于学生是不同的。对其他人而言,重新安置制度导致过高地强调了中六教育的A水平,这包括通过仓促教学,精心制定的重新安置策略,可疑的修订策略以及对第二次机会的依赖来尽早参加考试。所有这些有助于使学生理解什么才是有效知识或学习的意义。寄宿制在第六年级的教育中强化了应试文化,并导致人们越来越重视外在奖励,绩效目标和表面学习方法,这可能使学生无法在大学或终身学习上获得成功学习。 ud ud这项研究旨在证明针对高风险考试的精心设计的政策在课堂上的实际练习中会产生意想不到的后果。结论是,在制定教育和评估政策时,应适当考虑其对学生学习的影响及其对整个教育的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scott Eva Siu Mei Poon;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:11:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号