首页> 外文OA文献 >Culture as history: envisioning change across and beyond 'eastern' and 'western' civilizations in the May Fourth era
【2h】

Culture as history: envisioning change across and beyond 'eastern' and 'western' civilizations in the May Fourth era

机译:作为历史的文化:设想五四时代跨越“东方”和“西方”文明的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This essay examines an influential debate that took place during China’sMay Fourthudera (circa 1915–1927) concerning the character of ‘‘Eastern’’ and ‘‘Western’’udcivilizations. In this debate, both moderates and radicals wrestle with a growingudawareness that cultures have not only a spatial existence but also a historical career,udwhich has encouraged the development of certain institutions and attitudes anduddiscouraged others. Spatial terms mark not only the places where knowledgeudcirculates, but also the particular pasts-and thus futures-toward which Chineseudthinkers align themselves. This way of figuring ‘‘East’’ and ‘‘West’’ enables MayudFourth thinkers to do more than sort civilizational characteristics into categories ofudthe inevitably universal and the irredeemably particular, as many commentatorsudhave assumed. It also facilitates the travel of cultural products and practices acrossudthe spatial as well as temporal boundaries originally seen to contain them.
机译:本文探讨了在中国的“五四”时期(大约1915年至1927年)发生的关于“东方”和“西方” 文明化的辩论。在这场辩论中,温和派和激进派都在争先恐后地意识到文化不仅具有空间存在性,而且具有历史生涯,这鼓励了某些机构和态度的发展,而又使某些人不赞成。空间术语不仅标志着知识流通的地方,而且还标志着中国思想家与自己对齐的特定的过去(进而是未来)。这种“东方”和“西方”的计算方法使May udFourth思想家所做的不只是将文明特征归类为 ud,这是不可避免的普遍性和不可挽回的特殊性,正如许多评论家所假定的那样。它还促进了文化产品和实践在最初包含它们的空间和时间边界上的穿越。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jenco Leigh;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号