首页> 外文OA文献 >Real origins of the great depression: monopoly power, unions and the American business cycle in the 1920s
【2h】

Real origins of the great depression: monopoly power, unions and the American business cycle in the 1920s

机译:大萧条的真正根源:垄断力量,工会和1920年代的美国经济周期

摘要

We attempt to explain the severe 1920-21 recession, the roaring 1920s boom, and the slide into the Great Depression after 1929 in a unified framework. The model combines monopolistic product market competition with search frictions in the labor market, allowing for both individual and collective wage bargaining. We attribute the extraordinary macroeconomic and financial volatility of this period to two factors: Shifts in the wage bargaining regime and in the degree of monopoly power in the economy. A shift from individual to collective bargaining presents as a recession, involving declines in output and asset values, and increases in unemployment and real wages. The pro-union provisions of the Clayton Act of 1914 facilitated the rise of collective bargaining after World War I, leading to the asset price crash and recession of 1920-21. A series of tough anti-union Supreme Court decisions in late 1921 induced a shift back to individual bargaining, leading the economy out of the recession. This, coupled with the lax anti-trust enforcement of the Coolidge and Hoover administrations enabled a major rise in corporate profits and stock market valuations throughout the 1920s. Landmark pro-union court decisions in the late 1920s, as well as political pressure on firms to adopt the welfare capitalism model of high wages, led to collapsing profit expectations, contributing substantially to the stock market crash. We model the onset of the Great Depression as an equilibrium switch from individual wage bargaining to (actual or mimicked) collective wage bargaining. The general equilibrium effects of this regime change are consistent with large decreases in output, employment, and stock prices and moderate increases in real wages.
机译:我们试图在统一的框架下解释1920-21年的严重衰退,1920年代的轰隆声以及1929年后滑入大萧条。该模型将垄断产品市场竞争与劳动力市场中的搜索摩擦相结合,从而可以进行个人和集体工资谈判。我们认为这一时期的宏观经济和金融动荡是两个因素:工资谈判制度的变化和经济中垄断力量的变化。从个人谈判到集体谈判的转变是一种衰退,涉及产出和资产价值的下降,以及失业和实际工资的上升。 1914年《克莱顿法案》的工会条款促进了第一次世界大战后集体谈判的兴起,导致资产价格暴跌和1920-21年的衰退。最高法院在1921年后期作出的一系列严厉的反工会裁决使人们转向了讨价还价,从而使经济走出了衰退。再加上柯立芝和胡佛政府对反托拉斯执法的松懈,使得整个1920年代公司利润和股票市场估值出现了大幅增长。 1920年代末期具有里程碑意义的工会决议,以及企业采用高工资的福利资本主义模型的政治压力,导致利润预期下降,对股市崩盘作出了重大贡献。我们将大萧条的发生建模为从个人工资谈判到(实际或模仿的)集体工资谈判的均衡转变。这种政权更替的总体均衡效应与产出,就业和股票价格的大幅下降以及实际工资的适度增长相一致。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号