首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of a workplace intervention designed to interrupt prolonged occupational sitting on the health of desk-based employees
【2h】

The effect of a workplace intervention designed to interrupt prolonged occupational sitting on the health of desk-based employees

机译:旨在中断长时间的职业生涯的工作场所干预措施对台式员工的健康产生影响

摘要

Increasingly, environments such as the workplace have evolved into settings where prolonged sitting has become ubiquitous, most commonly among desk-based employees. The proliferation of sitting behaviour in the workplace can be attributed to a confluence of factors such as easy access to personal desktop computers, printers, and photocopiers; comfortable office chairs; and shared open plan office spaces that restrict opportunities to perform alternate behaviour to sitting. Effortless access and the convenience of technology has engineered movement out of the workday for many employees and workplaces.ududHealth research has identified a number of adverse effects associated with prolonged sitting such as increased risk of cardiovascular disease, increased all-cause mortality, and increases in indicators of metabolic syndrome; independent of adherence to recommended physical activity guidelines. Despite these negative associations, there is little evidence that workplace interventions have effectively addressed reducing sitting behaviour, or targeted the reduction of sitting as a primary outcome. To address these gaps, the effectiveness of a workplace intervention designed to interrupt sitting and increase short bouts of movement periodically throughout the workday was investigated in this thesis. The intervention depicted in this thesis is an interactive computer-based software program installed on the desktop computers of desk-based employees, predicated on a social ecological model that features a passive prompt to stimulate behaviour change by interrupting sitting at 45-minute intervals.ududTo test the effectiveness of the intervention on the health of desk-based employees, two sets of participants were examined in separate studies. In the first study the influence of the intervention on participants’ health was investigated by measuring self-reported energy expenditure and a battery of physiological biomarkers in an experimental group and a control group over a 13-week period. The participants were randomly assigned with replacement to either the experimental group who received the intervention (n = 20; mean age = 41.50 +/-12.39) or to the control group who did not (n = 26; mean age = 44.88 +/-9.65), and were full-time employees who worked eight-hour daily shifts and primarily had desk-based job responsibilities. Findings indicated that the intervention was effective in interrupting prolonged sitting and increasing short bouts of movement during the workday. This resulted in a significant increase in energy expenditure and a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure. There were no significant effects on the blood glucose, cholesterol, or triglyceride dependent variables.ududThe second study built upon the objective measures of the first study by testing participant perceptions of health behaviour change in the workplace, and if this change was sustainable. The participants (N = 43; mean age = 43.81 +/-9.94) were full-time employees who worked eight-hour daily shifts and primarily had desk-based job responsibilities. Participant perceptions of health and compliance to the intervention were collected over 26 weeks across three repeated measures: pre-test, post-test, and retention test. To measure the sustainability of perceptions of health behaviour change in the workplace, the passive prompting feature of the intervention was removed between the POS test and the retention test. In addition to supplement these measures of health, qualitative semi-structured interview data were collected throughout the experimental period.ududOnce the passive prompt was removed adherence to the intervention was significantly reduced. Despite this, participants’ perceptions of improved health, which increased significantly when the intervention prompted them passively, remained high once the prompt was removed. This was further substantiated by the interview data, which indicated that employees were more likely to adhere to the program if they were continuously prompted to do so. This suggests that passively interrupting prolonged periods of sitting and increasing movement throughout the workday is efficacious in improving several outcomes associated with health; but if sustainable change in sitting behaviour in desk-based employees is to occur a passive stimulus is necessary.
机译:越来越多的环境(例如工作场所)已经演变为长时间坐着无所不在的环境,最常见于办公桌员工。工作场所中就座行为的激增可归因于多种因素的融合,例如易于使用个人台式计算机,打印机和复印机;舒适的办公椅;以及共享的开放式办公室空间,从而限制了执行坐下行为的机会。不费吹灰之力和技术的便利性使许多员工和工作场所无法工作。 ud ud健康研究发现,长时间坐着会产生许多不良影响,例如心血管疾病的风险增加,全因死亡率增加,代谢综合症指标的增加;独立于推荐的体育锻炼准则。尽管存在这些负面关联,但几乎没有证据表明工作场所的干预措施已有效解决了减少就座行为,或将减少就座作为主要目标。为了解决这些差距,本文研究了旨在中断坐姿并在整个工作日中定期增加短暂运动的工作场所干预的有效性。本文中介绍的干预措施是在基于台式计算机的员工的台式计算机上安装的基于交互式计算机的软件程序,该程序基于一种社会生态模型,该模型具有被动提示功能,可以通过中断45分钟的间隔来刺激行为改变。 ud ud为了测试干预措施对台式员工健康的有效性,在独立的研究中检查了两组参与者。在第一项研究中,通过测量实验组和对照组在13周的时间内自我报告的能量消耗和一系列生理生物标志物,研究了干预对参与者健康的影响。参与者被随机分配至接受干预的实验组(n = 20;平均年龄= 41.50 +/- 12.39)或未接受干预的对照组(n = 26;平均年龄= 44.88 +/-)。 9.65),并且是全职员工,每天工作八小时,主要负责基于办公桌的工作职责。调查结果表明,该干预措施可有效中断长时间的坐着并增加工作日的短暂运动。这导致能量消耗显着增加,平均动脉压显着下降。对血糖,胆固醇或甘油三酸酯相关变量没有显着影响。 ud ud第二项研究基于第一项研究的客观指标,通过测试参与者对工作场所健康行为变化的看法以及这种变化是否可持续来进行。参与者(N = 43;平均年龄= 43.81 +/- 9.94)是全职员工,每天工作八小时,主要负责基于办公桌的工作。参与者对健康和对干预措施的依从性的看法是在26周内通过三种重复测量方法收集的:测试前,测试后和保留测试。为了衡量工作场所对健康行为变化的感知的可持续性,在POS测试和保留测试之间删除了干预的被动提示功能。除了补充这些健康措施外,整个实验期间还收集了定性的半结构化访谈数据。 ud ud一旦删除了被动提示,对干预的依从性就会大大降低。尽管如此,参与者对健康状况改善的看法在干预被消极提示后显着增加,而在消除提示后仍然保持很高的水平。访谈数据进一步证实了这一点,该数据表明,如果不断提示员工遵守该计划,则他们更有可能遵守该计划。这表明,在整个工作日内被动地中断长时间的坐着运动和增加运动量,可以有效改善与健康相关的几种结果;但是,如果要使台式员工的就座行为发生可持续变化,则必须采取被动刺激措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mainsbridge CP;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号