首页> 外文OA文献 >La globalisation de la RD industrielle : analyse et modélisation de la dynamique des centres de RD implantés à l'étranger grâce au concept des proximités
【2h】

La globalisation de la RD industrielle : analyse et modélisation de la dynamique des centres de RD implantés à l'étranger grâce au concept des proximités

机译:工业研发的全球化:在国外建立研发中心的动力的分析和建模

摘要

This thesis addresses the question of the dynamics of foreign industrial R&D centres.Just as Ronstadt (1978), Asakawa (2001) and Asakawa & Som (2008) did before us, we notice thatthe mission and the position of the R&D centres in their internal innovation network are changing over time. We have identified four different phases in these dynamics: 1/ the setting up of the centre, 2/ the double phase during which the centre builds up its own identity, thanks to its integration into its internal innovation network and the creation of its external innovation network, 3/ its maturity.One of the key questions was then to understand how the centre was able to rise from its first phase, during which it did not have its own identity, to its maturity phase, where it has its own speciality and is recognized as one of the key elements of its internal innovation network. In order to answer this question, we have identified the types of relationships between the centre, its internal innovation network and its local environment during each phase of its dynamics. We used the academic literature on clusters which tried to determine the types of relationships other than geographical proximity that make the exchanges of knowledge and know-how, as well as the creation of confidence between organisms possible. To answer this question, it introduces a concept which is not widely used in the academic literature on the globalisation of the R&D: the concept of proximities (Boschma 2005). Weused six types of proximities in order to understand the dynamics of the foreign R&D centres: the geographical proximity, the formal and informal institutional proximities, the organisational, cultural and social proximities. The results of our study show that each phase of the evolution of the foreign R&D centre can be characterised by an architecture of proximities between the centre, its internal innovation network and its local environment.Our results come from several empirical observations: 1/ we have built and organized a focus groupon the globalisation of R&D during two years. This focus group was made of several industrial R&Dmanagers, 2/ we have studies the Indian foreign R&D centres of four multinational companies: ABB,AkzoNobel, Procter & Gamble and Siemens, 3/ we have used several short case studies gatheredduring informal interviews and professional meetings on the globalisation of R&D. This empirical work has been realized in the framework of a public-private partnership between our laboratory and the European Association for Industrial Research Management (EIRMA).
机译:正如Ronstadt(1978),Asakawa(2001)和Asakawa&Som(2008)所做的那样,我们注意到了国外工业R&D中心的动态问题,我们注意到了R&D中心在其内部的使命和地位。创新网络随着时间而变化。我们已经确定了这些动态中的四个不同阶段:1 /建立中心,2 /双重阶段,在此期间,中心将其整合到内部创新网络中并建立外部创新,从而建立自己的身份网络3的成熟度。接下来的关键问题之一是了解该中心如何从其没有自己身份的第一阶段发展到具有自己的专业和被公认为其内部创新网络的关键要素之一。为了回答这个问题,我们已经确定了中心,其内部创新网络和其本地环境在每个动态阶段的关系类型。我们使用了有关集群的学术文献,这些文献试图确定除了地理邻近性以外的其他关系类型,这些关系使得知识和专有技术的交换以及在生物之间建立信任成为可能。为了回答这个问题,它引入了一个概念,该概念在有关研发全球化的学术文献中并未广泛使用:邻近性概念(Boschma 2005)。为了了解外国研发中心的动态,我们使用了六种类型的邻近度:地理邻近度,正式和非正式机构邻近度,组织,文化和社会邻近度。我们的研究结果表明,外国研发中心发展的每个阶段都可以通过中心,内部创新网络和当地环境之间的邻近结构来表征。我们的结果来自以下一些实证观察结果:1 /在两年内建立并组织了一个关于研发全球化的焦点小组。该焦点小组由几位工业研发经理组成,2 /我们研究了ABB,AkzoNobel,宝洁和西门子这四家跨国公司在印度的外国研发中心,3 /我们在非正式访谈和专业会议期间使用了一些简短的案例研究关于研发的全球化。这项经验性工作是在我们的实验室与欧洲工业研究管理协会(EIRMA)之间的公私合作关系框架内实现的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chassagneux Edwige;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号